5 Confirmed False Flag Operations and How to Spot Them in the Future

July 14, 2015   |   ANTIMEDIA

(ANTIMEDIA Op-Ed) The concept of the “false flag” operation has become almost prohibitively stigmatized in recent years because of the 9/11 “truther” movement and the emotional fallout from the tragedies at Sandy Hook, Aurora, Boston and others. In spite of being labeled “conspiracy theories,” real, verifiable false flag events have taken place in the past. Such examples serve to dismantle the notion that false flags are meritless conspiracy theories and can help destigmatize the concept itself, providing the diagnostic lens needed to identify false flags when they arise.

Author Richard Dolan made a presentation at the 2015 Contact in the Desert conference about what he calls the “false flag era.” According to Dolan, because false flag operations require control over the global media narrative and the ability to intimidate other countries into not speaking out against “inside jobs,” only a few countries have the means and motives to pull them off.

The false flag phenomenon is distinctively modern and used as an ideological weapon to control populations with the fear of a manufactured enemy. They are used in ostensibly democratic systems where people believe they have inalienable rights. Such democratic systems—primarily the United States, Israel, and Great Britain—must shock people into sociopolitical and geopolitical consent and, as such, require sophisticated modern propaganda systems and advanced covert operations teams with highly proficient skills.

Operation Gladio

Operation Gladio was a post-World War II program established by the CIA, NATO, and possibly Britain’s M16 to fight communism in Europe by whatever means necessary. The two-decade operation used CIA-created “stay behind” networks as part of a “Strategy of Tension” that unleashed a multitude of terrorist attacks from the late 1960s to the early 1980s. The attacks were blamed on Marxists and other left-wing political opponents in order to discredit communism. The operation involved multiple bombings that killed hundreds of innocent people, including children. The most notable attack was the August 2, 1980 bombing of the Bologna train station, which killed 85 people.

How do we know about Operation Gladio in spite of its incredibly clandestine nature? There are two principle sources. One, the investigations of Italian judge Felice Casson, whose presentation was so compelling it forced Italian Prime Minister Giulio Andreotti to confirm Gladio’s existence. The second source is testimony from an actual Gladio operative, Vincenzo Vinciguerra, who is serving a life sentence for murder. In a 1990 interview with the Guardian, Vincenzo stated that Gladio was designed to psychologically coerce the Italian public to rely on the state for security.

Operation Ajax

In 1953, the CIA launched Operation Ajax in order to overthrow Iran’s democratically elected leader, Mohammed Mosaddiq, and replace him with the Shah, a ruthless dictator. The United States sought to depose Iran’s nationalized Anglo-Persian oil company and install 5 U.S. oil companies to take over the nation’s oil fields. In order to do so, they staged a false flag operation that utilized propaganda and complex political maneuvers in order to create public revolt that eventually led to the United States and Britain’s MI6 military intelligence re-installing the Shah in order to throttle Iran’s oil supplies and transform the nation into a puppet regime of the United States government.

Most information relevant to this CIA-sponsored coup is declassified now and available in the CIA archives.

The CIA described itself Operation Ajax:

“The world has paid a heavy price for the lack of democracy in most of the Middle East. Operation Ajax taught tyrants and aspiring tyrants that the world’s most powerful governments were willing to tolerate limitless oppression as long as oppressive regimes were friendly to the West and to Western oil companies. That helped tilt the political balance in a vast region away from freedom and toward dictatorship.”

The Lavon Affair

In 1954, a year after Operation Ajax, Israel launched its own false flag operation. Code-named Operation Susannah, the Lavon Affair featured the covert operation of Israeli agents who planted bombs in several Egyptian, American, and British-owned cinemas, libraries and educational centers, including a United States diplomatic facility, framing eight Egyptian Muslims as the perpetrators.

One of the bombs detonated prematurely, which caused one of the bombers to be captured. A public trial exposed the Israeli spy ring and the covert operation. The operatives were convicted and two of them executed. Israeli Defense Minister Pinhas Lavon was forced to step down because of the scandal. However, the more far-reaching consequences of the Lavon Affair demonstrate once again how governments use false flags to achieve certain objectives that might not have been possible otherwise. In this case, according to a Stanford published paper, the operation triggered a chain reaction of game-changing events:

“A retaliatory military incursion by Israel into Gaza that killed 39 Egyptians; a subsequent Egyptian–Soviet arms deal that angered American and British leaders, who then withdrew previously pledged support for the building of the Aswan Dam; the announced nationalization of the Suez Canal by Nasser in retaliation for the withdrawn support; and the subsequent failed invasion of Egypt by Israel, France, and Britain in an attempt to topple Nasser. In the wake of that failed invasion, France expanded and accelerated its ongoing nuclear cooperation with Israel, which eventually enabled the Jewish state to build nuclear weapons.”


COINTELPRO was a series of clandestine, illegal FBI projects that infiltrated domestic political organizations to discredit and smear them. This included critics of the Vietnam War, civil rights leaders like Dr. Martin Luther King, and a wide variety of activists and journalists.

false flag

An example of the FBI’s attempts to convince Martin Luther King Jr. to kill himself under COINTELPRO. Click to enlarge.

The acts committed against them included psychological warfare, slander using forged documents and false reports in the media, harassment, wrongful imprisonment and, according to some, intimidation and possibly violence and assassination.

A U.S. Congressional committee documented the false flag component of the campaign, describing how the FBI had hired provocateurs from the 1950s through the 1970s to commit criminal and violent acts and falsely blame them on political activists. The campaign worked extremely effectively at disrupting the progressive momentum of the era.

Despite being formally discontinued, new permutations of COINTELPRO have persisted and include present-day efforts to undermine activists, whistleblowers and protests. In fact, a 2012 article published by The Guardian described the FBI’s crackdown on the Occupy movement as a “totally integrated corporate-state repression of dissent.”

Gulf of Tonkin

The Gulf of Tonkin incident, a major escalator of U.S. involvement in the Vietnam War, never actually occurred. The government essentially staged—or at the very least, utilized a patently false report—in order to manufacture a geopolitical narrative with a ready-made enemy, the North Vietnamese.

The original incident—also sometimes referred to as the U.S.S. Maddox Incident(s)—involved the destroyer U.S.S. Maddox supposedly engaging three North Vietnamese Navy torpedo boats as part of an intelligence patrol. The Maddox fired almost 300 shells.

President Lyndon B. Johnson promptly drafted the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution, which became his administration’s legal justification for military involvement in Vietnam. The problem is the event never happened—and Johnson had no reason to believe it had.

In 2005, a declassified internal National Security Agency study revealed that there were no North Vietnamese naval vessels present during the incident. So what was the Maddox firing at? In 1965, President Johnson commented, “For all I know, our Navy was shooting at whales out there.

The NSA’s own historian, Robert J. Hanyok, wrote a report stating that the agency had deliberately distorted intelligence reports in 1964. He concluded that

“The parallels between the faulty intelligence on Tonkin Gulf and the manipulated intelligence used to justify the Iraq War make it all the more worthwhile to re-examine the events of August 1964.”

The Warning Signs of a False Flag Operation:

~There is an immediate comprehensive narrative, including a convenient culprit. Law enforcement, government agencies, and the mainstream media immediately proffer a narrative that completely explains the event and encourages citizens to tie their intellectual understanding of the tragedy to the emotions they experience. In his lecture at Contact in the Desert, Richard Dolan noted that a distinguishing characteristic of a false flag operation is that the official narrative IS NOT questioned by the media. There are often legislative, ideological and sociopolitical power plays waiting in the wings, which the government can immediately implement. The most striking example of this is the Patriot Act, which was written well before 9/11 but seemed to correlate entirely with the events that had transpired.

~The official narrative has obvious domestic and geopolitical advantages for the governing body. The Bush administration used 9/11 to usher in the War on Terror, which has served as a lynchpin for countless civil liberty infringements by the national security state, including ubiquitous domestic surveillance and indefinite detention. It also directly paved the way for an invasion of Afghanistan and Iraq—countries that had nothing to do with the attacks—allowing our government and defense contractors to control the natural gas pipelines and oil fields. This bears a striking resemblance to Operation Ajax.

~The narrative behind the attack serves to leverage emotions like fear, as well as patriotism, in order to manufacture consent around a previously controversial issue. For example, many of the recent domestic terror attacks, including the Aurora shooting, have exacerbated and reinforced advocacy of gun control legislation. More importantly, these attacks divide populations and invite the government and militarized local police forces to have the authority to declare martial law at will, locking down entire neighborhoods. We saw this after the Boston marathon bombing, the most striking example of this nation’s post 9/11 police state mentality.

~Military training drills and police drills occur on the day of and very near the attack itself, causing confusion to obscure eye witness testimony and allowing orchestrators to plant both patsies, disinformation and backup operatives. This is no small point. An incredible percentage of major domestic or international terror attacks have involved simultaneous “training drills.” This list includes, but is not limited to, the infamous NORAD drills of 9/11, the 7/7 London Bombings, the 2011 Norway shooting, the Aurora shooting, Sandy Hook, and the Boston Marathon. Though none of the aforementioned events can be confirmed or denied without a doubt, they bear a striking resemblance to previous false flag attacks and should be looked at with an investigative eye.

The bigger false flags that occurred in the last two decades undoubtedly utilized unimaginable amounts of money and resources. It will take time and many contributions by intrepid researchers and whistleblowers to prove them.

The cases made for and against 9/11 being a false flag “inside job” are voluminous and highly controversial. The narrative is so convoluted with disinformation that despite all of the technology and online resources at our disposal, it is highly unlikely we will know for sure how many layers of shadow and black op agencies were used—if, in fact, they were. What we do know is that shortly before the events of 9/11, then-Secretary of State Donald Rumsfeld announced that $2.3 trillion dollars was missing from the Pentagon’s budget. Unfortunately, too much evidence has been destroyed or manipulated to reach a conclusive verdict as to whether it was a full blown false flag or an extreme case of state opportunism.

Remember, the story of the false flag phenomenon is one that is still being written. Our analysis of it must breach the most powerful information control filters the world has ever seen. As technology and social enlightenment make the crimes of the world’s national governments transparent, we will see shocking new chapters added to this history that will shatter mainstream perceptions of reality.

This article (5 Confirmed False Flag Operations and How to Spot Them in the Future) is an opinion editorial (OP-ED). The opinions expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not necessarily represent the views of Anti-Media. You have permission to republish this article under a Creative Commons license with attribution to the author and theAntiMedia.org. Tune in! Anti-Media Radio airs Monday through Friday @ 11pm Eastern/8pm Pacific. Help us fix our typos: edits@theantimedia.org.


Share This Post On


  1. Operation Notthwoods should be added to this list. It is when US intelligence wanted to plant bombs in Miami and blow them up anf then blame it on Cuba. The plan went all the way up to Kennedy wwho killed it.

    Post a Reply
  2. This country was built on false flag operations. Almost every major conflict has been under false flags. How you think dumbass hitler won his political party the majority? Also this country isnt democratic. Reason why we pledge allegience to the 'republic' and why we have representatives, if you can even call it that.

    Post a Reply
  3. If you're smart enough, I think you, and most of us have a pretty big bunch of GOOD guesses already.

    Post a Reply
  4. Although there is a large portion of the population that would agree, at current it can't be proven conclusively. This is because all the evidence was destroyed as quickly as possible. The redacted pages need to be made public.

    Post a Reply
  5. the golden rule of false flag: some 30 years must pass before they admit them

    Post a Reply
  6. I just wish more people would do their own research and ask questions instead of believing the official story.

    Post a Reply
  7. Richard Norwood your link is just pure antisemitic garbage. Being a Pole who had our country ravaged by the Germans and Soviets reading this saying that we basically 'asked for it' makes me want to vomit.

    Post a Reply
  8. Orlando. Media knew everything right away. Fit the administration's gun control agenda. Excessively high body count. Media report 1 killer, but witnesses say several. Videos of partyers carrying wounded in wrong direction and putting them down. Christine Leinonen obviously, and awfully, reading teleprompter. All media reflexively promulgate the official narrative, despite fact that investing could get them a lot of money and eyeballs. In 50 years we might find out it was a FEMA drill designed to push gun control.

    Post a Reply

    Post a Reply
  10. Ian Ian Ian Yep. As pointed out here (http://russia-insider.com/en/politics/how-spot-false-flag-event/ri15316), one has to wonder how much of the more far-fetched stuff is put out there to discredit the reasoable doubters and reseachers. The Kennedy assassination is a good example. It's to the point where no one can say anything without being open to being called a conspiracy nut. And after over 50 years (there was a peak of activity around the anniversary), the effort to discredit anyone who doubts the Lone Assassin theory is being diligently continued.

    I have to say, though, that this page shows an admirable level of reasonableness.

    Post a Reply
  11. Forgot to mention Nazi's false flag events. USA took the playbook from nazis in regards to creating EU, false flags, shock and awe doctrine, etc.

    Post a Reply
  12. And still in action today, no doubt we have Operation Mockingbird . It was a secret campaign by the United States Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) to influence media. It began in 1950 and continuing, no matter what our government would tell you.

    Post a Reply
  13. Evidence shows that the three World Trade Center towers collapsed into their own footprints as the result of controlled demolition.

    I approach the evidence from two viewpoints. The first is from an observational and historical perspective. The second is from an analytical approach that uses the law of physics. All of what I am saying is really a summary of many posts I have read on the internet

    Historical/observational perspective

    No other high rise buildings have ever collapsed due to fire alone. There are many posts on the Internet showing tall buildings engulfed in immense flames that have burned for hours and yet the buildings remain standing albeit severely damaged. Yet on 9/11, three buildings fell into their own footprints at a uniform acceleration spewing tons of dust in pyroclastic clouds in a process much like the clouds that spew from a volcano.

    Even if the fires were hot enough to melt steel – and they weren't – you would not expect the buildings to fall down in the manner that they did. Melting and bending steel would melt and bend in uncontrolled and unpredictable ways. You would most likely see the building topple over and only partially collapse. In fact, there is one video that shows melting steel flowing from the side of the tower. There is also a video that shows a steel member ejected from one of the tall towers trailing white smoke. It follows a normal gravitational arc when all of a sudden it is projected straight downward trailing smoke in zig-zag manner. This is strong evidence for thermite painted on the steel member.

    Firemen reported many instances of glowing, molten steel in the rubble and others reported hearing explosions. One must also be suspicious that someone ordered the steel members to be removed and shipped away immediately. In other words, evidence was removed from a potential crime scene.

    One piece of scientific evidence and its deliberate obfuscation

    The final NIST report written in 2008 documented 2.25 seconds of absolute free fall of WTC7. For any object to fall at the acceleration of gravity, it must encounter no resistance. The only way a building can fall in such a manner is because there were carefully placed and time explosives.

    The NIST report included the free fall segment in three phases of the collapse and concluded that WTC7 fell at a rate 40% longer than free-fall. A high school student who would submit a report as egregiously false as the NIST report would get an "F".

    The only thing controversial about the collapse of the three towers is the fact that no one can believe that our own government would do such a thing.

    Post a Reply
  14. You mean neophite pilots didn't out-fly Jimmy Doolittle and the laws of physics apply in Tribeca too?!

    Post a Reply
  15. small potatoes. Here's some rather larger warmongering ops with major false flag components:

    *Lusitania (floating bomb with human shield, conceived by Churchill, operationalized by Admiralty Intel))

    *Pearl Harbor (provocation by FDR+ foreknowledge via Churchill, Brit intel))

    *9/11 (conceptualized by Bush43 neo-conz, operationalized by Mossad/Saudi Intel)

    Post a Reply
  16. The lesson here is that we cannot know what is real and what is false until it is too late and after the fact. Our only defense against powers willing to resort to mass murder of others or their own to enrage their population is for us to refuse the knee-jerk reaction of rage and hate. Reasoned and informed condemnation is one thing, but allowing fear and hate to guide us is a trap. I think John Lennon might had it right the whole time (no wonder the FBI was after him too).

    Post a Reply
  17. lets be realistic here flase flag operations are a lot older than is stated in this article, even the romans used them as an excuse to start or restart wars..

    Post a Reply
  18. Well if CDC and WHO can make people think that four mossie bites, with zika, was the cause of 5,000 vaccine damaged babies being born in Brazil, and also hide the fact that 25,000 vaccine damaged babies are now born in USA per year (and no zika there?) ………. I call that fraud. Every pregnant woman got a Tdap shot (GSK brand manufactured, at the same institute, now creating the zika vaccine?? how absurd)………. The women got the shots from May 2015, when the vaccine was ready, from 20 weeks gestation, and the disabled babies were born from 20 weeks later. So to hide the biggest medical scandal in the world, they now blame a mossie? Because FOUR of the 5,000 who had the vaccine, in utero, also had zika? 2 had syphilis, why aint they blaming syphilis? Cant create a new vaccine on that one! As for the 25,000 a year babies now born vaccine damaged in the USA< seems CDC, just burning all the statistics on that one! Except it wasnt until the truth got out, they realised their mistake, and removed their own statistical report. Oh, and the babies? they still catching whooping cough, why? Because all their vaccinated siblings, still catch, carry and spread it near constantly, they just dont get real immunity, nor symptoms, because of their vaccines. Which fails by age 6-12, and they all get this minor long lasting cough. Australia had 50% vaccination rates with the old DTP, 400 whooping cough cases a year, no baby deaths, by 14 years after introduction for the DTap is CRAP vaccine, and 98.5% vaccination RATE !!! in kids, we had 90,000 vaccinated kids WITH WHOOPING COUGH, 210,000 vaccinated symptomless carriers, and 5-10 baby deaths…….. all caused from being infected by the vaccinated.

    Post a Reply
  19. Sharbard Stradtlater Look into Martin Bryant …………. Tasmania, yeah we fell for it in Australia, guns got taken. Now? It is so absurd, that this poor man with low IQ,, could ever, ever have killed that many people, 19 direct head shots in 19 seconds, with 19 bullets, while shooting from right hip, as he stood and turned? Impossible, so, there was NEVER an inquest, NEVER a trial, and anyone who spoke up about it at the time, had their livelihoods destroyed. Evil in this world.

    Post a Reply
  20. Scott Oneill they are uniquely modern though in that countries now have to have complete control over globalized world and media narrative in ostensibly democratic nations. Different than in previous empires.

    Post a Reply

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *