Can Jet Fuel Really Melt Steel Beams? The 9/11 Truth Debate Rages On

December 24, 2015   |   Derrick Broze

The non-profit organization Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth have released a statement in response to a recent viral video which claimed to disprove the popular phrase “Jet Fuel Can’t Melt Steel Beams.”

Derrick Broze
December 23, 2015

(ANTIMEDIAOn December 15, a blacksmith named Trenton Tye posted a two-minute video in which he attempted to prove steel could melt and bend — thus debunking the theory the World Trade Center Twin Towers and Building 7 were destroyed by controlled demolition. Tye’s video has been viewed nearly seven million times.

Following the video’s release — and subsequent virality — much of the corporate media (and other websites that generally dismiss the possibility of government conspiracies altogether), celebrated what they considered to be a well-deserved funeral for a disproved meme. Indeed, the Washington Post, the Daily Mirror, and the Huffington Post all covered the story favorably, with Huffington Post declaring, “Metal Worker Shuts Down 9/11 Truthers… With His Pinkie.”

From the looks of these articles, it seems 9/11 Truthers can finally shut up, grow up, and get real jobs, right?! But does Trenton Tye’s video really prove the official story of the 9/11 attacks?

Architects & Engineers (A&E) for 9/11 Truth founder, Richard Gage, of the American Institute of Architects, wrote:

“Tye’s attempt to disprove controlled demolition by heating a half-inch piece of steel to 1,800°F and bending it like a ‘noodle’ is way off. He seems to think the controlled demolition argument goes like this, ‘Fire can’t melt steel, so the buildings couldn’t have collapsed from fire.’ He couldn’t be more mistaken.

“The only reason that melting steel is discussed at all is because government officials, engineers, first responders, and others observed large amounts of molten metal (requiring temperatures of more than 2,800°F) in the debris of all three buildings.”

As Gage points out, the pools of molten metal could not have been caused by office fires or jet fuel that exploded in the initial crash. According to Gage and A&E for 9/11 Truth, “the only plausible explanation is thermite, an incendiary that can be used to cut through structural steel.”

Researchers within the 9/11 Truth community have long talked of the presence of thermite and possibly nano-thermite, an even stronger incendiary device, at the Ground Zero wreckage.

As many have by now noticed, Tye’s demonstration also fails because he admits to heating the sample piece of steel to a temperature of 1,800°F, a temperature fires within the World Trade Center buildings could not have reached.

Jet fuel fires reach temperatures of around 1,500°F only under optimal conditions. In open air conditions like the WTC buildings, they burn at around 600°F,” Gage writes. “Even according to the government agency that investigated the disaster, there is no evidence that any of the steel was heated to the point where it would lose its strength.”

Gage goes on to point out that several steel-frame high-rises have been completely engulfed in flames for periods much longer than the WTC towers — but not one caused the total, symmetrical collapse of the building.

On the 14th anniversary of the 9/11 attacks, the Boston Globe ran an op-ed as part of its continuing campaign against anyone who dares to question the official government version of events. Gage recently responded, stating, “As building professionals, we at Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth try not to let personal feelings interfere with investigating the three worst structural failures in modern history. Nearly 2,400 architects and engineers, not including the 109 who signed our petition at the recent annual trade show ABX, have joined us because we stick to science.

“The physical evidence shows that scattered office fires could not have caused the 47-story WTC 7 to collapse symmetrically into its footprint. (Imagine Boston’s 52-story Prudential Tower completely collapsing in seven seconds from small fires — it’s hard to, isn’t it?) The evidence also shows that the twin towers were not leveled by the airplane impacts and ensuing fires.

The implications are indeed far-reaching, and that is why we urge people to study all the evidence before reaching a conclusion.”

Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth have also recently released a publication titled, “Beyond Misinformation: What Science Says About the Destruction of World Trade Center Buildings 1, 2, and 7.”

What do you think? Does Trenton Tye’s video prove jet fuel can, indeed, melt steel beams? Or is this yet another attempt by the powers that be — and the unwitting and unquestioning public — to obfuscate evidence the American people were lied to on September 11, 2001? Leave your comments below.

For a deeper look at the 9/11 Truth movement in 2015 check out Declassify the Truth: A 9/11 Documentary.

This article (Can Jet Fuel Really Melt Steel Beams? The 9/11 Truth Debate Rages On) is free and open source. You have permission to republish this article under a Creative Commons license with attribution to Derrick Broze and Anti-Media Radio airs weeknights at 11pm Eastern/8pm Pacific. If you spot a typo, email

Author: Derrick Broze

Derrick Broze joined Anti-Media as an independent journalist in July of 2014. His topics of interest include solutions to the police state, the surveillance state, economic inequality, attacks on Native communities, and oppression in all its forms. He was born in Houston, Texas.

Share This Post On


  1. so there was an oven holding the jet fuel on the steel beams until it became hot enough to make the beams melt…. interesting theory I guess….

    Post a Reply
  2. Since you so smart, please explain to me how world trade centre 7 fell in constructive demolition style without it being hit by a Boeing 747?

    Post a Reply
  3. Lolollll lmao, beams weren't only bent, even a month later, under tons of debris, some beams were still in fusion, that means liquid state, due to thermite!

    Post a Reply
  4. wait… I was wrong… the flaming liquid that turned itself into 1800 degrees upon explosion, traveled out of the plane through the building and found the beams so that it could then melt the beams enough to weaken it so the building could collapse, just like you did when you left the rod in the oven for an untold amount of time. Is that what we the sheeple are suppose to belive man ?? I see it now !!

    Post a Reply
  5. so how did it not melt EVERYTHING around it on it's path to the steel rods, if it was hot enough to MELT STEEL….. ooopss… sorry, I know, I know, "nothing to see here, that's all in the past son"…..

    Post a Reply
  6. Les Harrison people are dumb man. People actually believe sticking a 1/2" steel rod into an oven is comparable to steel girders used in building construction being exposed to an uncontrolled fire… People, are just, dumb.

    Post a Reply
  7. Holy shit !! Do you realize EVERY time a plane crashes it has the potential to completely LEVEL a 100+ Story building with 1800 degree liquid fuel capable of DISENTEGRATING STEEL just spewing everywhere !! WTF are we thinking sending 100's of these things into the air every day !!! WTF !! and if you believe that……….

    Post a Reply
  8. sorry, not Disentegrating…. just melting it in one of the largest buildings every desinged….I know I exxagerated a little

    Post a Reply
  9. sure it could ! "….. and if you want to know how Tower 7 fell then all you have to do is follow the trail of Jet Fuel as it bounced off the top and hit a couple of very strategical locations on this skyscraper as well. America this is indeed a tragedy. Who would have thought that Jet fuel would cause such calamity. Why we send 100's of these things in the air every day is a mystery since they are so dangerous, capable of spewing steel melting 1800 degree liquid every time they crash "

    ……. ooops is that what that REALLY means ?? sheeple will believe anything……

    Post a Reply
  10. jesus christ we are really still arguing about this?. I was only 14 at the time and I immediately knew something was weird, I remember thinking it looked exactly like a controlled demolition of a casino that I had seen; go back and look at the footage again. You'll see explosions occuring every other floor.. there were even firefighters that heard explosions.. they found evidence of nano thermites in the wreckage. Translation: there were bombs in the buildings; it was a scam to get us to agree to go to war. get over it. If you think the government is infallible and wouldnt sacrifice lives in order to achieve their goals; just keep on putting your head in the sand.. You enjoy your bliss.

    Post a Reply
  11. Israel most probably paid this stupid mf to put this bs on youtube, if you look at the evidence then everything points to the Jewish Zionist Psychopaths. They had the capability to do all this. Not arabs with box cutters that's BS and the plan of Israel expanding its borders is in a well oiled motion, starting war with surrounding countries and using Americans to maim and kill, you couldn't get anymore convenient than that. Israel is the main beneficiary out of this war on terror. What a coincidence right?

    Post a Reply
  12. I earn 25 dollars every 30 minutes. It sounds unbelievable but it's true. check it out this link for details.

    w­­­w­­­w.f­­­r­­­e­­­e­­­l­­­a­­­n­­­c­­­e-c­­­a­­­s­­­h.c­­­o­­­mCOPY THE LINK

    Post a Reply
  13. Metal from the girders flowed like lava from the wreckage. No comparison. We're not sure what happened, but the official story is ridiculous and false.

    Post a Reply
  14. Les Harrison The excess heat was absorbed by the concrete and ALL OTHER MATERIALS PRESENT resulting o the dissolution of said concrete and materials into fine powder, as is to be expected of course.

    Post a Reply
  15. I am ­­­­­­­­­making ­­­­­­­­­a ­­­­­­­­­good ­­­­­­­­­salary ­­­­­­­­­from ­­­­­­­­­home ­­­­­­­­­$1200­­­­­­­­­-­­­­­­­­­$2500/week , ­­­­­­­­­which ­­­­­­­­­is ­­­­­­­­­amazing, under ­­­­­­­­­a year ago I ­­­­­­­­­was ­­­­­­­­­jobless ­­­­­­­­­in ­­­­­­­­­a ­­­­­­­­­horrible ­­­­­­­­­economy. ­­­­­­­­­I ­­­­­­­­­thank God ­­­­­­­­­every ­­­­­­­­­day ­­­­­­­­­I was ­­­­­­­­­blessed ­­­­­­­­­with ­­­­­­­­­these ­­­­­­­­­instructions and ­­­­­­­­­now ­­­­­­­­­it's ­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­my ­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­duty ­­­­­­­­­to ­­­­­­­­­pay ­­­­­­­­­it ­­­­­­­­­forward ­­­­­­­­­and share ­­­­­­­­­it ­­­­­­­­­with ­­­­­­­­­Everyone, ­­­­­­­­­Here is ­­­­­­­­­I ­­­­­­­­­started,,,,,,­­­­­­­­­

    ➥➥➥­­➥➥➥­w­­­­w­­­­w­­­­.­­­­2­­­­4­­­­f­­­­o­­­­r­­­­b­­­­e­­­­sR­­­­e­­­­p­­­­o­­­­r­­­­t­­­­s­­­­.­­­­c­­­­o­­­­m­­­­­……………..W­­o­­r­­k­­ A­­t ­­H­­o­­m­­e­­
    C­­o­­p­­y­­&­­P­­a­­s­­t­­e­­ T­­h­­i­­s­­ L­­i­­n­­k

    Post a Reply
  16. Generally speaking, the American public is neither intellectually nor emotionally equipped to deal with Truth. Perhpas if we could get some talking animals with three-fingered white gloves and no sex organs to expain the physics of the massive government lies of 9/11, they would open their eyes. Once it was "Give me liberty or give me death." Today it's, "Give me a credit card, an SUV and a wide-screen and I'll believe every drop of slop you shovel into my feeding trough."

    Post a Reply
  17. If the jet fuel can do what he says about the steel girders, what are jet engines made of?

    Post a Reply
  18. I am ­­­­­­­­­making ­­­­­­­­­a ­­­­­­­­­good ­­­­­­­­­salary ­­­­­­­­­from ­­­­­­­­­home ­­­­­­­­­$1200­­­­­­­­­-­­­­­­­­­$2500/week , ­­­­­­­­­which ­­­­­­­­­is ­­­­­­­­­amazing, ­­­­­­­­­under a ­­­­­­­­­year ago I ­­­­­­­­­was ­­­­­­­­­jobless ­­­­­­­­­in ­­­­­­­­­a ­­­­­­­­­horrible ­­­­­­­­­economy. ­­­­­­­­­I ­­­­­­­­­thank God every ­­­­­­­­­day ­­­­­­­­­I ­­­­­­­­­was blessed with ­­­­­­­­­these ­­­­­­­­­instructions and ­­­­­­­­­now ­­­­­­­­­it's ­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­my ­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­duty ­­­­­­­­­to ­­­­­­­­­pay it ­­­­­­­­­forward ­­­­­­­­­and share ­­­­­­­­­it with ­­­­­­­­­Everyone, ­­­­­­­­­Here is ­­­­­­­­­I ­­­­­­­­­started,,,,,,­­­­­­­­­

    ➤➤➤➤➤➤ ­­­­­­­­w­­w­­w­­.­­­­­­­f­­­­o­­­­x­­­­-­­­­r­­­­e­­­­v­­­­i­­­­e­­­­w­­­­s­­­­­­­­7­­­­­­.­­c­­o­­m­……………..W­­o­­r­­k­­ A­­t ­­H­­o­­m­­e­­
    C­­o­­p­­y­­&­­P­­a­­s­­t­­e­­ T­­h­­i­­s­­ L­­i­­n­­k­­ …. ☺ 🙂 GooD Luck ☺ 🙂

    Post a Reply
  19. This could possibly exlain why the upper floors that were actually buring could collapse, but the physics falls apart because the falling structure doesn't lose momentum from each floor that is struck on the way down. Try THAT in your workshop.

    Post a Reply
  20. G­­o­­­o­­­g­­l­­e­­­ i­­s­­ <­­-p­­a­­y­­i­­n­­g­­ 9­­7­­$ p­­e­­r h­­o­­u­­r! ­­W­­o­­r­­k ­­f­­­­o­­r ­­f­­­­e­­­­w­­ h­­­­o­­u­­r­­s ­­a­­n­­d h­­a­­v­­e l­­o­­n­­g­­e­­r w­­i­­t­­h­­ f­­­­r­­i­­e­­n­­d­­s & ­­f­­a­­m­­i­­l­­y­­! ­­O­­n ­­t­­u­­e­­s­­d­­a­­y I g­­o­­t a­­ g­­r­­e­­a­­t ­­n­­e­­w­­ L­­a­­n­­d­­ R­­o­­v­­e­­r ­­R­­a­­n­­g­­e ­­R­­o­­v­­e­­r­­ f­­r­­o­­m h­­a­­v­­i­­n­­g e­­a­­r­­n­­e­­d­­ $­­8­­7­­2 t­­h­­i­­s l­­a­­s­­t­­ f­­o­­u­­r­­ w­­e­­­­e­­k­­s. I­­t­­s­­ t­­h­­e­­ m­­o­­s­­t-­­f­­i­­n­­a­­n­­c­­i­­a­­l­­y­­ r­­e­­w­­a­­r­­d­­i­­n­­g ­­I­­'­­v­­e ­­h­­a­­d­­.­­ I­­t­­ s­­o­­u­­n­­d­­s­­ u­­n­­b­­e­­l­­i­­e­­v­­a­­b­­l­­e­­ b­­u­­t ­­y­­o­­u w­­o­­n­­t f­­o­­r­­g­­i­­v­­e ­­y­­o­­u­­r­­s­­e­­l­­f i­­f ­­y­­o­­u ­­d­­o­­n­­’­­t­­ c­­h­­e­­c­­k i­­t­­…


    Post a Reply

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *