MIT Study Warns About the Dangers of Geoengineering & Weather Modification

September 13, 2015   |   Derrick Broze

Derrick Broze
September 13, 2015

(ANTIMEDIA) As humanity works to avoid further environmental and ecological destruction to the planet, scientists continue to search for possible solutions to the numerous issues facing our species. One of these proposed solutions has been the science of geoengineering.

According to a 2013 congressional report:

“The term ‘geoengineering’ describes this array of technologies that aim, through large-scale and deliberate modifications of the Earth’s energy balance, to reduce temperatures and counteract anthropogenic climate change. Most of these technologies are at the conceptual and research stages, and their effectiveness at reducing global temperatures has yet to be proven. Moreover, very few studies have been published that document the cost, environmental effects, socio-political impacts, and legal implications of geoengineering. If geoengineering technologies were to be deployed, they are expected to have the potential to cause significant transboundary effects.

In general, geoengineering technologies are categorized as either a carbon dioxide removal (CDR) method or a solar radiation management (SRM) method. CDR methods address the warming effects of greenhouse gases by removing carbon dioxide (CO2) from the atmosphere. CDR methods include ocean fertilization, and carbon capture and sequestration. SRM methods address climate change by increasing the reflectivity of the Earth’s atmosphere or surface.

Aerosol injection and space-based reflectors are examples of SRM methods. SRM methods do not remove greenhouse gases from the atmosphere, but can be deployed faster with relatively immediate global cooling results compared to CDR methods.”

Geoengineering is seen as a controversial solution, to say the least. That controversy is likely to deepen following a recent study from MIT’s Center for Global Change Science and the Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences. The study, published in Nature’s Scientific Reports, has found that ocean fertilization geoengineering would alter global rainfall patterns and affect water resources.

Ocean fertilization is a type of geoengineering that seeks to mimic the ability of phytoplankton, the microalgae at the base of most oceanic food webs, to photosynthesize sunlight. As the phytoplankton absorb carbon dioxide, they also release dimethyl sulfide (DMS) into the atmosphere, which can form sulfate aerosols and reflect sunlight and cool the climate. Geoengineers hope to reproduce this natural process and thus reflect sunlight and cool the Earth.

According to Phys.org, the researchers used one of the global climate models used by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), which simulates the evolution of and interactions among the ocean, atmosphere, and land masses. These simulations found that increased DMS emissions would actually lead to an increase of 1.2 degrees Celsius by 2100 and substantial reduction in precipitation for some regions.”

Chien Wang, a co-author of the study and a senior research scientist at MIT’s Center for Global Change Science and the Department of Earth, said the study was “the first in-depth analysis of ocean fertilization that has highlighted the potential danger of impacting rainfall adversely.”

Benjamin Grandey, a senior postdoc in Wang’s group who configured the model simulations and analyzed the data, said that although “Generally, our results suggest that the cooling effect associated with enhanced DMS emissions would offset warming across the globe, especially in the Arctic,” it would also lead to dangerous changes in global weather. “Precipitation would also decline worldwide, and some parts of the world would be worse off. Europe, the Horn of Africa, and Pakistan may receive less rainfall than they have historically,” Grandey stated.

The lower rainfall could reduce water resources considerably and threaten the environment and livelihoods of the animals and people in the affected regions.

The MIT team is not the first to ring the alarm bells when it comes to geoengineering and other forms of weather modification. Although a number of authorities have warned about the dangers of geoengineering techniques, the risks are seen as secondary to the perceived risks of climate change. The interesting thing to note is that although proponents of geoengineering hail it as the solution to climate change and sustaining life, studies show that geoengineering could actually have the reverse effect of heating the Earth.

In February of 2015, an international committee of scientists released a report stating that geoengineering techniques are not a viable alternative to reducing greenhouse gas emissions to combat the effects of climate change. The committee report called for further research and understanding of various geoengineering techniques, including carbon dioxide removal schemes and solar-radiation management before implementation.

The scientists found that Solar Radiation Management, or albedo-modification techniques, are likely to present “serious known and possible unknown environmental, social, and political risks, including the possibility of being deployed unilaterally.” The report was sponsored by the National Academy of Sciences, the U.S. intelligence community, NASA, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, and the U.S. Department of Energy.

Another danger of manipulating the weather is the loss of blue skies. According to a report by the New Scientist, Ben Kravitz of the Carnegie Institution for Science has shown that releasing sulphate aerosols high in the atmosphere would scatter sunlight into the atmosphere. He says this could decrease the amount of sunlight that hits the ground by 20% and make the sky appear more hazy.

According to a 2013 study published in the Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, if geoengineering programs were started and then suddenly halted, the planet could see an immediate rise in temperatures, particularly over land. The study, titled, “The impact of abrupt suspension of solar radiation management,” seems to indicate that once you begin geoengineering, you cannot suspend the programs without causing the very problem you were seeking to resolve.

What are the solutions to the many ecological and environmental problems facing humanity? The studies indicate that attempting to play God with the weather will have disastrous effects on the ability of the human population to live and prosper. If you fear the results of mad scientists controlling the weather or pursuing dangerous solutions like geoengineering, please share this article and continue to spread knowledge. It is time for the awakened people of this Earth to stand together against those who seek to destroy the planet — and seek solutions that work with Earth rather than seeking to dominate and exploit it.


This article (MIT Study Warns About the Dangers of Geoengineering & Weather Modification) is free and open source. You have permission to republish this article under a Creative Commons license with attribution to Derrick Broze and theAntiMedia.org. Tune in! The Anti-Media radio show airs Monday through Friday @ 11pm Eastern/8pm Pacific. Help us fix our typos: edits@theantimedia.org.

Author: Derrick Broze

Derrick Broze joined Anti-Media as an independent journalist in July of 2014. His topics of interest include solutions to the police state, the surveillance state, economic inequality, attacks on Native communities, and oppression in all its forms. He was born in Houston, Texas.

Share This Post On

16 Comments

  1. Start working at home with Google! i think It's by-far the best job I've had. Last Wednesday I got a brand new BMW since getting a check for $6474this – 4 weeks past. I began this 8-months ago and immediately was bringing home at least $77 per hour. I want to work through this link, go to tech tab for work detail..

    w­w­w.c­a­s­h­i­t­2­3.c­o­m

    Post a Reply
  2. my roomate's step-aunt makes $73 /hour on the laptop . She has been fired from work for eight months but last month her check was $12321 just working on the laptop for a few hours.

    try this out ——> ­­­­­­­­w­­­­­­­w­­­­­­­w­­­­­­­.­­­­­­­n­­­­­­­e­­­­­­­t­­­­­­­c­­­­­­­a­­­­­­­s­­­­­­­h­­­­­­­2­­­­­­­1­­­­­­­.­­­­­­­c­­­­­­­o­­­­­­­m­­­­­­­

    Post a Reply
  3. ☛ ☛ ☛ Yahoo CEO Marissa Meyer has gone so far as to Support the practice "work at home", it is the good way to earn more and more money at home.$45h – $65h…how? part time or full time, I've been bringing in $63h¿ , You can make $38h easily. You can check it out here…
    it is completely free to register..
    >>> w­­­w­­­w­­­.­­­s­­­m­­­a­­­r­­­t­­­c­­­a­­­s­­­h­­­5­­­6­­­.­­­c­­­o­­­m

    Post a Reply
  4. They have been doing it for decades……………The Military Industrial Complex and HAARP are controlling the jet stream and the weather. For decades they have been spraying us with aluminum, barium and strontium, lead and mercury. Chemical trails sprayed from planes all over the globe. Look Up. The spraying is interfering with the normal activity of the sun. Asthma, Alzheimers, Autism and ADHD are on the rise. The elite (Illuminati…Agenda 21) want to reduce the population. They have underground bunkers built, while we will have to face the ongoing global warming which they are making worse with their geo-engineering or Solar Radiation Management. They say it is to cool the planet by reflecting back the suns rays with the heavy metal particulates. But they are creating a heat box. Trees and animal species are dying. Forests are burning up. They are steering the jet stream up and over CA creating their drought along with other places around the world. The ice is melting to almost nothing in the Arctic as we speak. Methane gas is releasing into the atmosphere. They now want to rape the Arctic as they have with the rest of the planet. Geoengineering is shredding the ozone layer, altering the weather patterns, polluting our air, waters and soils. Let's join in the fight. For more reliable info go to: https://www.facebook.com/dane.wigington.geoengineeringwatch.org

    Post a Reply
  5. part time and full time free online jobs
    my neighbor's sister makes $62 /hr on the computer . She has been out of work for 5 months but last month her pay check was $16315 just working on the computer for a few hours. original site,,
    $►►►►$ >>>>
    w­w­w­.j­o­b­s­c­u­t­7­.c­o­mOpen The Link

    Good Luck An Try Your Fate 턾

    Post a Reply
  6. This article is stating that Military Industrial Complex is only talking about messing with the climate to fix it. BUT they are and have been doing this for a few decades. It has been causing weather havoc all over the globe. We are breathing in nano particles of barium, aluminum and strontium (coal ash) that they have been spraying! We eat and drink it. They are also creating a heat box. Forest are burning with great intensity. Methane gas is being released in the Arctic. ADHD, Alzheimers, Asthma, Autism and more are on the rise. Plant and animal species are going extinct. Funny how Monsanto has water and aluminum resistant seeds. It's a nightmare. For more reliable information go to https://www.facebook.com/dane.wigington.geoengineeringwatch…

    Post a Reply
  7. G­­o­o­gle­ is <-paying 97$ per hour! Work for few hours and have longer with friends & family! On tuesday I got a great new Land Rover Range Rover from having earned $8752 this last four weeks. Its the most-financialy rewarding I've had. It sounds unbelievable but you wont forgive yourself if you don’t check it…
    ==== w­­w­­w­­.­T­­i­­m­­e­­-i­­s­­C­­a­­s­­h­­.­­c­­o­­­m

    Post a Reply
  8. I've made $64,000 so far this year w0rking 0nline and I'm a full time student. I'm using an 0nline business opportunity I heard about and I've made such great m0ney. It's really user friendly and I'm just so happy that I found out about it. Here’s what I've been doing…

    t­i­n­y­u­r­l­.­c­o­m­/profitit899

    Post a Reply
  9. Start working at home with Google! i think It's by-far the best job I've had. Last Wednesday I got a brand new BMW since getting a check for $6474this – 4 weeks past. I began this 8-months ago and immediately was bringing home at least $77 per hour. I want to work through this link, go to tech tab for work detail..
    >>>>> ­­­­­­t­­­­­­i­­­­­­n­­­­­­y­­­­­­u­­­­­­r­­­­­­l­­­­­­.­­­­­­c­­­­­­o­­­­­­m­­­­­­/jobsfb55

    Post a Reply
  10. Start working at home with Google! It’s by-far the best job I’ve had. Last Wednesday I got a brand new BMW since getting a check for $6474 this – 4 weeks past. I began this 8-months ago and immediately was bringing home at least $177 per hour. I work through this link,
    go? to tech tab for work detail,
    ———————–>>>> ­­w­­w­­w­.­t­­­­­­i­­­­­­n­­­­­­y­­­­­­u­­­­­­r­­­­­­l­­­­­­.­­­­­­c­­­­­­o­­­­­­m­­­­­­/maxxcash

    Post a Reply
  11. my roomate's step-aunt makes $73 /hour on the laptop . She has been fired from work for eight months but last month her check was $12321 just working on the laptop for a few hours.

    try this out ——> ­­­­­­­­w­­­­­­­w­­­­­­­w­­­­­­­.­­­­­­­n­­­­­­­e­­­­­­­t­­­­­­­c­­­­­­­a­­­­­­­s­­­­­­­h­­­­­­­2­­­­­­­1­­­­­­­.­­­­­­­c­­­­­­­o­­­­­­­m­­­­­­­

    Post a Reply
  12. If geoengineering techniques are adopted to reduce global warming and it turns out that the 'consensus' on it was more a matter of political expediency than hard science, we could easily wind up dying en masse in an ice age.

    Perhaps we should find out what is actually going on before we do something drastic about it?

    Post a Reply
  13. If geoengineering techniques are adopted to reduce global warming and it turns out that the 'consensus' on it was more a matter of political expediency than hard science, we could easily wind up dying en masse in an ice age.

    Perhaps we should find out what is actually going on before we do something drastic about it?

    Post a Reply
  14. Im making over $7k a month working part time. I kept hearing other people tell me how much money they can make online so I decided to look into it. Well, it was all true and has totally changed my life. This is what I do…

    ++]]]]\-===8 MUHA[[[[]]]]YFUH;;;;;;;; ­­­­­­­­­­­­­­w­­­­­­­­­w­­­­­w­­­­­.­­­­­m­­­­­o­­­­­n­­­­­e­­­­­y­­­­­t­­­­­i­­­­­m­­­­­e­­­­­8­­­­­8­­­­­.­­­­­c­­­­­o­­­­­m­­­­­Allah Rakha

    Post a Reply
  15. geo engineering by dispursing soft metals into our atmosphere is trapping heat from the sun making 'climate change' manipulatable to facilitate fires- not just sickness- as witnessed by the massive chemtrails over ft mac leading up to the fires- these chems are not reflecting heat off the earth- they trap it* someone does not want us living in suburbia on resource rich land- this is war, culling and herding us into cities- it will get worse- not better- please note, Canada does not own the tarr sands, China does* Harper sold it years ago to the chinese- an easy search on google-

    Post a Reply

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>