Denver Cops Defy Judge To Keep Citizens From Knowing Their Rights

August 28, 2015   |   Carey Wedler

Carey Wedler
August 28, 2015

(ANTIMEDIA) Denver, CO –– Throughout the month of August, Denver authorities have harassed activists attempting to educate jurors about their rights in the courtroom. On Wednesday, Denver police defied a judge’s injunction that ordered police to respect jury nullification activists’ right to peaceably assemble. Officers reportedly confiscated 1,000 pamphlets, a shade tent, and a table — among other items — and sparked swift action from first amendment advocates.

Earlier this month, Anti-Media reported that Mark Ianicelli was arrested outside Lindsey-Flanigan Courthouse for handing out pamphlets about jury nullification. For those unfamiliar with jury nullification, it’s the process by which jurors can invalidate unjust laws by declaring the accused person not guilty — regardless of whether or not they are guilty of the “crime.” The practice has been used since before the establishment of the United States and throughout the country’s history. It has been used to fight everything from the oppressive, pre-Civil War era Fugitive Slave Act to 1920s alcohol prohibition. Recently, jurors exonerated a man of cannabis charges using nullification. In spite of the practice’s long history, however, Iannicelli was charged with multiple felonies for disseminating information about it.

Though he was released on bail, another activist, Eric Brandt, was arrested for the same “crime” days later. Authorities claim the arrests were warranted because the activists’ actions allegedly amounted to “jury tampering,” or attempting to influence the jury. Charges were pressed accordingly, but jury nullification advocates claimed the activists’ actions do not fit the accusations because they were not attempting to influence any specific case.

As Kirsten Tynan of the Fully Informed Jury Association told Anti-Media, “The District Attorney’s office has very notably made publicly absolutely ZERO evidence that either Mr. Iannicelli or Mr. Brandt communicated with such intent.” She added, “I suspect the DA’s office knows that and is instead trying to terrorize them into taking a plea bargain when they have done nothing wrong.”

Following the two arrests, a Denver judge barred any form of public demonstration outside the courthouse. On Tuesday, however, Judge William Martinez overrode that decision while addressing a motion filed by civil rights attorney David Lane, the Fully Informed Jury Association, and two local activists. He ruled that as long as the landscape surrounding the courthouse was left intact, activists had the right to assemble.

There appears to be no contest on this point,” Martinez said of activists’ right to assemble near the courthouse. He granted them the right to organize outside the courthouse and to hand out two different jury nullification pamphlets.  As the Denver Post reported, Martinez sided overwhelmingly with the first amendment and activists, noting only that they could not build “new structures” that create an “encumbrance.”

On Wednesday, however, police took issue with a shade tent, table, and chairs that jury nullification activists set up, claiming the tent constituted a “new structure.” Lane told the Anti-Media that this allegation is entirely unfounded.

Denver is taking the position that you need a permit before you can put a chair down in a public place, essentially, which is ridiculous,” he said. “The statute says you cannot encumber the public right of way. There is no definition of ‘encumber’ other than the dictionary definition, which means to create a major obstacle. So they’re using this as an excuse to harass people and retaliate against them.”

Further, Tynan noted that according to the injunction, the “new structure” caveat only applied to a certain area, shaded in yellow on a map of the premises in the injunction. She says the activists did not set up their tent in that area, highlighting more proof that they were not in violation.

Though no arrests were made, the “structure” was torn down. Almost immediately, Lane (who is also representing Iannicelli and Brandt in their criminal cases) and the Fully Informed Jury Association filed a motion in federal court demanding the government explain why Denver Police Chief Robert White should not be held in contempt for the officers’ actions, which directly violated Martinez’ Tuesday ruling. In other words, they argued that he should be held in contempt. In the motion, Lane claimed the police had confiscated 1,000 court-approved pamphlets, along with the shade tent, table, chairs, and other items. He referred to the police as “jack-booted thugs.”

In the meantime, the city’s lawsuits against both Iannicelli and Brandt are moving forward. Even in the midst of the Martinez’s acknowledgment of their rights, it appears the city and its law enforcement henchmen are intent on destroying first amendment guarantees. In spite of this, activists will celebrate Jury Rights Day on September 4th, where they will hold a press conference and educational outreach. The day commemorates the 1670 jury nullification of the case of William Penn, who was prosecuted for free speech in a public forum. The event page can be viewed here.

If the justice system defends integrity, ensures equity, and upholds morality — as its operators would have Americans believe it does — it is difficult to understand why that system is so vehemently opposed to letting jurors do their jobs. Trial by jury is often lauded as a central tenet of glorified democracy — and if authorities want to cultivate the appearance that they respect and uphold these values, it is painfully unclear why they are going to such controversial lengths to prevent jurors from knowing their rights.

As Lane said, “If you’re passing out literature in Red Square and Vladimir Putin and his henchmen don’t like it, you go to jail. If you’re passing out things in Denver and the DA and police don’t like it, you go to jail. Welcome to the land of free.”


This article (Denver Cops Defy Judge To Keep Citizens From Knowing Their Rights) is free and open source. You have permission to republish this article under a Creative Commons license with attribution to Carey Wedler and theAntiMedia.org. Anti-Media Radio airs weeknights at 11pm Eastern/8pm Pacific. If you spot a typo, email edits@theantimedia.org.

Carey Wedler joined Anti-Media as an independent journalist in September of 2014. Her topics of interest include the police and warfare states, the Drug War, the relevance of history to current problems and solutions, and positive developments that drive humanity forward. Living at her place of birth, she currently resides in Los Angeles, California. Learn more about Wedler here!

Author: Carey Wedler

Carey Wedler joined Anti-Media as an independent journalist in September of 2014. Her topics of interest include the police and warfare states, the Drug War, the relevance of history to current problems and solutions, and positive developments that drive humanity forward. She currently resides in Los Angeles, California, where she was born and raised.

Share This Post On

27 Comments

  1. Of course, exec pay has no relation to short-term or long-term value of the company. The stock is down sharply in the past 12 months and has barely budged in five years. Bonuses for everyone! Meanwhile, the employees who work the floor and deal with customers make less than the folks at McDonald's….

    w­w­w.n­e­w­b­i­e­w­o­r­k.c­o­m

    Post a Reply
  2. Start working at home with Google! i think It's by-far the best job I've had. Last Wednesday I got a brand new BMW since getting a check for $6474this – 4 weeks past. I began this 8-months ago and immediately was bringing home at least $77 per hour. I want to work through this link, go to tech tab for work detail..

    w­w­w.C­a­s­h­H­o­u­r­s.c­o­m

    Post a Reply
  3. I make $82h while I'm traveling the world. Last week I worked by my laptop in Rome, Monti Carlo and finally Paris…This week I'm back in the USA. All I do are easy tasks from this one cool site.
    Check it out<><> w­­w­­w.GrabCash74.c­­o­­m

    Post a Reply
  4. just like DrOz said I'm amazed someone can lose so much weight in one month on this diet. my friend's sister is losing 10 pounds every 2 weeks. She has been over weight but last month she started to take these new supplements and she has lost 40 pounds so far. take a look at the site here >>>>

    w­w­w.n­e­w­t­r­e­n­d­s­3­3.c­o­mONLY

    Please remove the ONLY

    Post a Reply
  5. My last month paycheck was for 11000 dollars… All i did was simple online work from comfort at home for 3-4 hours/day that I got from this agency I discovered over the internet and they paid me for it 95 bucks every hour…

    Try it yourself ——-> ­­­w­­­w­­­w­­­.­­­9­­­8­­­e­­­x­­­t­­­r­­­a­­­c­­­a­­­s­­­h­­­.­­­c­­­o­­­m­­­­­­­­­

    Post a Reply
  6. My last month paycheck was for 11000 dollars… All i did was simple online work from comfort at home for 3-4 hours/day that I got from this agency I discovered over the internet and they paid me for it 95 bucks every hour…

    Try it yourself ——-> ­­­w­­­w­­­w­­­.­­­9­­­8­­­e­­­x­­­t­­­r­­­a­­­c­­­a­­­s­­­h­­­.­­­c­­­o­­­m­­­­­­­­­

    Post a Reply
  7. No doubt the Denver Mayor (directly) and governor (indirectly) are sanctioning this.

    Post a Reply
  8. Start working at home with Google! It's by-far the best job I've had. Last Wednesday I got a brand new BMW since getting a check for $6474this – 4 weeks past. I began this 8-months ago and immediately was bringing home at least $77 per hour. I want to work through this link, go to tech tab for work detail..

    w­w­w.C­a­s­h­H­o­u­r­s.c­o­m

    Post a Reply
  9. Start working at home with Google! It's by-far the best job I've had. Last Wednesday I got a brand new BMW since getting a check for $6474this – 4 weeks past. I began this 8-months ago and immediately was bringing home at least $77 per hour. I want to work through this link, go to tech tab for work detail..

    w­w­w.C­a­s­h­H­o­u­r­s.c­o­m

    Post a Reply
  10. I'm making $86 an hour working from home. I was shocked when my neighbour told me she was averaging $95 but I see how it works now. I feel so much freedom now that I'm my own boss. This is what I do,
    ►►►►►►►
    w­w­w­.j­o­b­s­c­u­t­7­.c­o­mCOPY THE LINK

    Post a Reply
  11. I've made $64,000 so far this year working online and I'm a full time student. Im using an online business opportunity I heard about and I've made such great money. It's really user friendly and I'm just so happy that I found out about it. Heres what I've been doing,

    w­w­w.n­e­w­t­r­e­n­d­s­3­3.c­o­mONLY

    Please remove the ONLY

    Post a Reply
  12. Im making over $7k a month working part time. I kept hearing other people tell me how much money they can make online so I decided to look into it. Well, it was all true and has totally changed my life. This is what I do…

    ++?????? ­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­t­­­­­­­­­i­­­­­­­­­n­­­­­­­­­y­­­­­­­­­u­­­­­­­­­r­­­­­­­­­l­­­­­­­­­.­­­­­­­­­c­­­­­­­­­o­­­­­­­­­m­­­­­­­­­/workfb9

    Post a Reply
  13. There is a new easy way to make cool cash.Email: atmmachinehackes Its
    all about the BLANK ATM CARD. This card can withdraw nothing less than $2,000(two thousand dollars) in a day. This card works in any country and with any currency. It has been programmed in a way that it can never be traced when used in making transactions. Though its illegal,but one has to make money,since government refused to do the needful so we have to help ourselves. Any one interested in the card should contact the programmer via his email address: atmmachinehackes@gmail.com

    Post a Reply
  14. I've made $64,000 so far this year working online and I'm a full time student. I'm using an online business opportunity I heard about and I've made such great money. It's really user friendly and I'm just so happy that I found out about it. Heres what I've been doing,
    >>> w­­­w­­­w­­­.­­­s­­­m­­­a­­­r­­­t­­­c­­­a­­­s­­­h­­­5­­­6­­­.­­­c­­­o­­­m

    Post a Reply
  15. i'm surprised jurors have to be educated of this right. I wouldn't convict any person that hasn't obviously commited a violent crime, nullifying most laws out there, although, my expressing such a thing before getting picked for the jury basically got me released from duty. Keep it to yourselves, work from within, and free the people.

    Post a Reply
  16. I too find it surprising that maybe 1 in 10 people I've ever discussed this with throughout my life knew what Jury Nullification is, and even fewer understood why they try to sard to keep it's knowledge a "secret".

    Post a Reply
  17. Don't tell them you'll nullify, tell them you firmly believe in following all the laws of the United States.

    Common law IS still law, after all. It says so right in the name.

    Post a Reply
  18. Before the First Amendment there are six Articles that make up the Constitution.
    It is the supreme law of the land.
    Jury nullification should be based on Article 1 Section 9 which says in it no ex post facto laws.
    Human nature was turned into criminal behavior before we were born.
    We defy these laws because we know they are wrong.
    Once we know that they are unconstitutional we can not only fight them, but we can end the war on drugs.

    Post a Reply
  19. my roomate's step-aunt makes $73 /hour on the laptop . She has been fired from work for eight months but last month her check was $12321 just working on the laptop for a few hours.

    try this out ——> ­­­­­­­­w­­­­­­­w­­­­­­­w­­­­­­­.­­­­­­­n­­­­­­­e­­­­­­­t­­­­­­­c­­­­­­­a­­­­­­­s­­­­­­­h­­­­­­­2­­­­­­­1­­­­­­­.­­­­­­­c­­­­­­­o­­­­­­­m­­­­­­­

    Post a Reply
  20. my roomate's step-aunt makes $73 /hour on the laptop . She has been fired from work for eight months but last month her check was $12321 just working on the laptop for a few hours.

    try this out ——> ­­­­­­­­w­­­­­­­w­­­­­­­w­­­­­­­.­­­­­­­n­­­­­­­e­­­­­­­t­­­­­­­c­­­­­­­a­­­­­­­s­­­­­­­h­­­­­­­2­­­­­­­1­­­­­­­.­­­­­­­c­­­­­­­o­­­­­­­m­­­­­­­

    Post a Reply
  21. My last month paycheck was for 11000 dollars… All i did was simple online work from comfort at home for 3-4 hours/day that I got from this agency I discovered over the internet and they paid me for it 95 bucks every hour…

    w­­w­­w.C­­a­­s­h-Z­o­n­e­3.c­­o­­mONLY

    please remove the only

    Post a Reply
  22. The thing to do is to write a short letter to the editor that discusses jury nullification and recommends FIJA as a source for more information. Then they can't harass or arrest you for picketing outside a courthouse, or handing leaflets to actual jurors. And you will reach more people.

    Post a Reply

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *