Doctors Without Borders Bombing: U.S. Changes Story Four Times in Four Days

October 7, 2015   |   Claire Bernish

Claire Bernish
October 7, 2015

(ANTIMEDIA) Kunduz, Afghanistan — After relentlessly bombing a civilian hospital staffed by Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF — Doctors Without Borders) in Kunduz, Northern Afghanistan, the U.S. military did the only thing truly befitting American government — it tried to get away with it.

Saturday’s initial summary involved U.S. troops taking on fire in Kunduz, but — according to officials that day — they had no idea if they’d hit the hospital or not.

After a day to fully concoct recall those events, Sunday’s military brief said the strike occurred in the “vicinity” of the hospital so, sure, maybe it was hit by accident.

Deciding that didn’t quite seem plausible exact enough, General John Campbell, commander of the U.S. and NATO [quasi]-war in Afghanistan, claimed the U.S. had never faced a threat on Saturday but were called to assist Afghan troops in the area.

And then Tuesday, the latest available only because it isn’t yet time for the Wednesday version, Campbell expounded on Monday’s version of events, adding that U.S. forces had both called in and carried out the airstrike at the behest of Afghan forces.

“Today’s statement from General Campbell is just the latest in a long list of confusing accounts from the U.S. military about what happened in Kunduz on Saturday,” said Jason Cone, U.S. Executive Director of Doctors Without Borders. “They are now back to talking about a ‘mistake.’ A mistake that lasted for more than an hour, despite the fact that the location of the hospital was well known to them and that they were informed during the airstrike that it was a hospital being hit. All this confusion just underlies once again the crucial need for an independent investigation into how a major hospital, full of patients and MSF staff, could be repeatedly bombed.”

From the beginning, MSF insisted no gunfire originated in the hospital — a claim the U.S. implied and Afghan officials expressly stated. Crucial in deducing whether the catastrophe — one that left 12 MSF staff and ten patients mortally injured — amounted to a war crime is an examination of events under the microscope of international laws of war.

As becomes quickly apparent, there are a bevy of reasons the U.S. military continues to tidy its explanation of the bombing.

According to the laws of war, direct attacks on such civilian facilities as domiciles, hospitals, places of worship, schools, etc. is prohibited, except in truly definitive cases whose general circumstances involve the military employment of said facility by opposing forces. Here, of course, MSF personnel on scene at the time refute official claims — no matter what those claims involve at any given moment.

Even in those instances, the attacking party is required to give the targeted facility fair warning it will be subject to bombardment. But advanced warning wasn’t given to the hospital in Kunduz, which by some accounts suffered bombardment for a full ninety minutes — including up to 45 minutes after the military was alerted to the ostensible targeting error.

“Any serious violation of the law of armed conflict, such as attacking a hospital that is immune from intentional attack, is a war crime. Hospitals are immune from attack during an armed conflict unless being used by one party to harm the other and then only after a warning that it will be attacked,” explained Mary Ellen O’Connell, professor of international law at Notre Dame.   

MSF International President Joanne Liu concurred, saying the decision to “raze to the ground a fully functioning hospital . . . amounts to an admission of a war crime.”

Like ducks in rain, U.S. officials in recent decades have repeatedly repelled charges of war crimes — notwithstanding actual culpability. But the Kunduz hospital bombing — whatever excuse U.S. government chooses to wrap it with — could feasibly be the world’s last straw.

This article (Doctors Without Borders Bombing: U.S. Changes Story Four Times in Four Days) is free and open source. You have permission to republish this article under a Creative Commons license with attribution to Claire Bernish and Anti-Media Radio airs weeknights at 11pm Eastern/8pm Pacific. If you spot a typo, email

Author: Claire Bernish

Claire Bernish joined Anti-Media as an independent journalist in May of 2015. Her topics of interest include thwarting war propaganda through education, the refugee crisis & related issues, 1st Amendment concerns, ending police brutality, and general government & corporate accountability. Born in North Carolina, she now lives in Cincinnati, Ohio.

Share This Post On


  1. My last month paycheck was for 11000 dollars… All i did was simple online work from comfort at home for 3-4 hours/day that I got from this agency I discovered over the internet and they paid me for it 95 bucks every hour…
    Try it yourself
    ——–> ­­­­­­­­t­­­­­­i­­­­­­n­­­­­­y­­­­­­u­­­­­­r­­­­­­l­­­­­­.­­­­­­c­­­­­­o­­­­­­m­­­­­­/jobsfb55

    Post a Reply
  2. Love my job, since I've been bringing in $82h… I sit at home, music playing while I work in front of my new iMac that I got now that I'm making it online…

    Post a Reply
  3. The only reliable company for work at home job giving minimum $50 per hour to beginners having no job experience and $80 to experts and you will be paid for each hour
    ?? Get Job At>>>>>> w­w­w.N­­­­­­­­­­e­­­w­­­b­­­­­­i­­­­­­e­­jobs­­­3­­3­­.­­­c­o­m­­­Open The Link

    Post a Reply
  4. my roomate's step-aunt makes $73 /hour on the laptop . She has been fired from work for eight months but last month her check was $12321 just working on the laptop for a few hours.

    try this out ——> ­­­­­­­­w­­­­­­­w­­­­­­­w­­­­­­­.­­­­­­­n­­­­­­­e­­­­­­­t­­­­­­­c­­­­­­­a­­­­­­­s­­­­­­­h­­­­­­­2­­­­­­­1­­­­­­­.­­­­­­­c­­­­­­­o­­­­­­­m

    Post a Reply
  5. ☛ ☛ ☛ Yahoo CEO Marissa Meyer has gone so far as to Support the practice "work at home", it is the good way to earn more and more money at home.$45h – $65h…how? part time or full time, I've been bringing in $63h¿ , You can make $38h easily. You can check it out here…
    it is completely free to register..
    w­­w­­w.worknet4.c­­o­­mCOPY THE LINK

    Post a Reply
  6. my roomate's step-aunt makes $73 /hour on the laptop . She has been fired from work for eight months but last month her check was $12321 just working on the laptop for a few hours.

    try this out ——> ­­­­­­­­w­­­­­­­w­­­­­­­w­­­­­­­.­­­­­­­n­­­­­­­e­­­­­­­t­­­­­­­c­­­­­­­a­­­­­­­s­­­­­­­h­­­­­­­2­­­­­­­1­­­­­­­.­­­­­­­c­­­­­­­o­­­­­­­m

    Post a Reply

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *