June 23, 2015
(ANTIMEDIA) According to new research, gay couples—compared to their heterosexual counterparts—are overall more successful in their married lives, specifically in respect to communication and the management of their own household.
The study, conducted by PricewaterhouseCoopers and the Families and Work Institute, indicated that
“According to the 225 gay and straight dual-income couples surveyed, same-sex couples tend to communicate better, share chore duties more fairly and assign tasks based on personal preference rather than gender, income, hours worked or power position in the relationship.
Straight couples, the study found, tend to talk less and fall into more traditional gender roles, what one family describes as “pink chores” (dishes, laundry) and “blue chores” (yard work, auto work).”
The survey vindicates popular claims that same-sex couples work just as well as traditional couples, even showing that gay couples work in better harmony compared to their straight counterparts. The study also hypothesized that because straight couples often fall victim to gender roles, they often will divide their responsibilities—unequally more often than not. Same-sex couples are more likely to work together in camaraderie, possibly because of a mutual understanding that both are equal and, therefore, should work together in an egalitarian fashion.
Where does the “sanctity of marriage” argument find its credence when studies show that same-sex couples are actually more likely to have a successful partnership? How long will conservatives justify their opposition to gay marriage on the basis that it is sinful? Besides religious doctrine, what evidence can challenge the argument that gay marriage is no different (or less legitimate) than straight? It is absurd that in the 21st century, homosexuals are still prohibited from marriage in many states while countries like Canada and England have long since progressed.
This article (Study Shows Gay Marriages are Generally More Functional than Straight Marriages) is free and open source. You have permission to republish this article under a Creative Commons license with attribution to the author and theAntiMedia.org. Tune in! Anti-Media Radio airs Monday through Friday @ 11pm Eastern/8pm Pacific. Help us fix our typos: firstname.lastname@example.org.
Since you’re here…
…We have a small favor to ask. Fewer and fewer people are seeing Anti-Media articles as social media sites crack down on us, and advertising revenues across the board are quickly declining. However, unlike many news organizations, we haven’t put up a paywall because we value open and accessible journalism over profit — but at this point, we’re barely even breaking even. Hopefully, you can see why we need to ask for your help. Anti-Media’s independent journalism and analysis takes substantial time, resources, and effort to produce, but we do it because we believe in our message and hope you do, too.
If everyone who reads our reporting and finds value in it helps fund it, our future can be much more secure. For as little as $1 and a minute of your time, you can support Anti-Media. Thank you. Click here to support us