Hillary Clinton Calls For “Toppling” the 1%…While Being Bankrolled by the 1%

April 22, 2015   |   Nick Bernabe

Op-Ed by Nick Bernabe
April 21, 2015

(ANTIMEDIA) This really happened. As crazy as it sounds, Hillary Clinton is trying to repackage her war-torn reputation into a populist spitting image of progressive icon Elizabeth Warren. The New York Times reports that “Mrs. Clinton pointed at the top category and said the economy required a ‘toppling’ of the wealthiest 1 percent, according to several people who were briefed on Mrs. Clinton’s policy discussions.”

The New York Times and Huffington Post didn’t bother asking the questions that should have been asked, with their reporting easily summed up by the opening line in the HuffPo peice: “Hillary Clinton believes that strengthening the middle class and alleviating income inequality will require ‘toppling’ the wealthiest 1 percent of Americans, according to a New York Times profile published on Tuesday.” That statement, so far, has gone relatively unquestioned by the corporate media.

But, as we all know, politicians tend to say things when they’re campaigning that differ greatly from what they actually do in real life. Firstly, Hillary Clinton’s stance that the 1% needs to be toppled goes directly against the interests of her biggest financiers. Behold her greatest campaign contributors since 1989 below:


A few familiar faces — Citigroup, Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan, Time Warner, 21st Century Fox (?) — which all happen to fall under the 1% category that Hillary is now claiming to despise. But Wall Street knows the name of the game, it is their game now after all, isn’t it? Politico asked them what they thought about Hillary’s pseudo-populist agenda a few days ago:

Back in Manhattan, the hedge fund managers who’ve long been part of her political and fundraising networks aren’t sweating the putdown and aren’t worrying about their take-home pay just yet.


It’s ‘just politics,’ said one major Democratic donor on Wall Street, explaining that some of Clinton’s Wall Street supporters doubt she would push hard for closing the carried-interest loophole as president, a policy she promoted when she last ran in 2008.

William Cohan at Politico added,

Down on Wall Street they don’t believe it for a minute. While the finance industry does genuinely hate Warren, the big bankers love Clinton, and by and large they badly want her to be president. Many of the rich and powerful in the financial industry—among them, Goldman Sachs CEO Lloyd Blankfein, Morgan Stanley CEO James Gorman, Tom Nides, a powerful vice chairman at Morgan Stanley, and the heads of JPMorganChase and Bank of America—consider Clinton a pragmatic problem-solver not prone to populist rhetoric. To them, she’s someone who gets the idea that we all benefit if Wall Street and American business thrive. What about her forays into fiery rhetoric? They dismiss it quickly as political maneuvers. None of them think she really means her populism.


This must be some kind of inside joke. 

Wall Street knows it’s all politics. They continue funneling money into her campaign knowing that once she gets into office everything will be just fine for the 1%. These superficial, pseudo-populist calls for empowerment of the common working American will fall to the wayside once she’s elected. Hillary Clinton’s campaign is expected to raise $2 billion dollars during her 2016 presidential run. A large portion of that money is expected to come from two of her closest support groups in the private sector: Wall Street and the military-industrial-complex. Not exactly surprising considering her cozy ties to the banking industry and her track record of supporting pretty much every war America has been in since she became a politician.

The opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of TheAntiMedia.org.

This article (Hillary Clinton Calls For “Toppling” the 1%…While Being Bankrolled by the 1%) is free and open source. You have permission to republish this article under a Creative Commons license with attribution to the author and TheAntiMedia.org. Tune in! The Anti-Media radio show Monday through Friday @ 11pm Eastern/8pm Pacific. Image credit: Marc Novell. Help us fix our typos: edits@theantimedia.org.

Author: Nick Bernabe

Nick Bernabe founded Anti-Media in May of 2012. His topics of interest include civil liberties, the drug war, economic justice, foreign policy, geopolitics, government corruption, the police state, politics, propaganda, and social justice. He currently resides in Chula Vista, California, where he was born and raised.

Share This Post On


  1. Hillary is BS. I am a progressive, and will vote progressive candidates ONLY. ONLY. ONLY.

    Post a Reply
  2. And who would the progressive candidate be? Seems to me like you will vote DUMB, DUMB and more DUMB

    Post a Reply
  3. Lol, its not like American employment, industry, export or debt will get better. Whoever you vote for, you are fucked. Why not just boycott these elections? Hilary Clinton? Are you fucking kidding me? Throw her in prison already!

    Post a Reply
  4. She is probably the most dishonest candidate in the race, and that is quite an achievement.

    Post a Reply
  5. I said as much in this article and on the radio this week. Please feel free to republish my article, Nick Bernabe. laprogressive.com/paul-krugman-wrong-on-hillary/

    Post a Reply
  6. If you refer to Waka Flocka Flame, then I would agree with you. 🙂

    Post a Reply
  7. Im voting for a libertarian conservative period, I am tired of seeing freedoms lost or restricted due to fear mongering. Truth is. If we do not get a handle on the debt. You wont have to worry about entitlements or welfare. We need to get the jobs back to America. But that is going to be hard to do, China has the world market by the balls cheap labor and soon robot labor

    Post a Reply
  8. Antimedia, a highly disreputable site is posting silly spam that says Hillary calls for the "toppling" of the One-Percent. This piece then goes on to show that Hillary receives campaign donations from the largest corporations of America like every single national candidate. Unless you are a Romney supporter Corporations are not people and therefore cannot be part of the One-Percent. But if you believe Corporations are the One-Percent than you must think that Hillary supports "toppling" the largest corporations of America. In either case the site antimedia dot org is promoting silly spam.
    But if Hillary is receiving private donations from the richest Americans I will bet you anything she will still advocate raising the tax rate on those same Americans as proposed by the Democrat platform as she is evidently proposing in her "toppling" comment.

    Post a Reply
  9. yummy yummy kool aid. drink up!

    Post a Reply
  10. The owners of those corporations are part of the 1%. And, legally speaking, corporations are considered people with rights and everything!

    Post a Reply
  11. John Carr And anyone, corporation or individual, who doesn't take a tax deduction for which they are eligible, anyone who decided to pay a tax they don't have to pay, such a person is suspected of being an idiot.

    Post a Reply

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *