Lawsuit Accuses Federal Government of Withholding Info on GMO Crops for 10 Years

August 31, 2015   |   Derrick Broze

Derrick Broze
August 31, 2015

(ANTIMEDIA) On August 25th, the Center for Food Safety (CFS) filed a lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) for failure to adequately respond to Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests related to genetically engineered (GE) crops. This marks the fourth time the CFS has sued APHIS to force the release of records.

The CFS accuses APHIS of failing to respond within a timely manner to at least 29 of their FOIA requests or appeals. The lawsuit is the center’s latest attempt to force APHIS to respond to FOIA requests and to order the agency to “stop its practice of failing to respond to FOIA requests related to GE crops.”

Cristina Stella, staff attorney for the Center for Food Safety, says that APHIS has a history of inadequate regulation of GMO crops. “In the absence of thorough government oversight, public access to information about these crops becomes all the more critical,” Stella said. “This lawsuit is necessary to stop APHIS from continuing to ignore its duty to provide the public with information that affects farmers, communities, and the environment.”

Stella also says that the longer APHIS fails to regulate the GMO crops, the more the environment will face damage, including transgenic contamination of nearby crops, pesticide drift, and endangerment of protected species.

CFS has been seeking information about these harms for over ten years—and for over ten years, APHIS has continually ignored our requests. It cannot continue to do so,” she noted.

The CFS argues that APHIS has failed in several ways, including not responding to a FOIA request related to GE sorghum. The CFS says crops like GE sorghum were engineered by inserting genes that are not on APHIS’s “plant pest” list. This means the USDA does not have the authority to regulate the crops. CFS says this is allowing GE crops to spread without proper studies or public knowledge.

The CFS also says APHIS’s silence has made it more difficult to mitigate harm caused by GE crops that escape from field trials, known as “unauthorized releases.” Crops that escape could possibly contaminate traditional or organic crops. The group also charges that APHIS ignored requests for information related to field trials of Monsanto’s “Roundup Ready” creeping bentgrass.

Advancing the public’s knowledge on controversial topics like genetically engineered crops is vitally important. After all, in late July the U.S. House of Representatives passed a measure that would prohibit the labeling of GE crops, with the Senate expected to take up the bill in September.

Anti-Media recently reported that “independent GMO researcher” Kevin Folta, a professor and chairman of the Horticultural Sciences Department at the University of Gainesville, received a $25,000 grant from Monsanto. The revelation is a brutal reminder that every individual should do their own research and be skeptical of all official sources of information.


This article (Lawsuit Accuses Federal Government of Withholding Info on GMO Crops for 10 Years) is free and open source. You have permission to republish this article under a Creative Commons license with attribution to Derrick Broze and theAntiMedia.org. Anti-Media Radio airs weeknights at 11pm Eastern/8pm Pacific. If you spot a typo, email edits@theantimedia.org.

Derrick Broze joined Anti-Media as an independent journalist in July of 2014. His topics of interest include solutions to the police state, the surveillance state, economic inequality, attacks on Native communities, and oppression in all its forms. He was born in Houston, Texas. Learn more about Broze here!

Author: Derrick Broze

Derrick Broze joined Anti-Media as an independent journalist in July of 2014. His topics of interest include solutions to the police state, the surveillance state, economic inequality, attacks on Native communities, and oppression in all its forms. He was born in Houston, Texas.

Share This Post On

5 Comments

  1. I make $82h while I'm traveling the world. Last week I worked by my laptop in Rome, Monti Carlo and finally Paris…This week I'm back in the USA. All I do are easy tasks from this one cool site.

    w­­w­w­.­4­c­a­s­h-h­o­u­r­s­.­c­o­mCOPY THE LINK

    Post a Reply
  2. Hey Sara, your comment is nonsensical spam. And yet more logical and truthful than this bunk from the center for food safety.

    Post a Reply
  3. Unfortunately, the USDA does for sure have the authority to regulate crops, whether a gene was insterted from a "pest crop" or not. Nowhere in law is there any wording about it having to be a gene from a "pest crop." Actually, genes that are inserted are not from pest crops because the chemicals that GMOs are sprayed with are engineered to destroy pest crops. The genes that are inserted are genes from crops that aren't pests, but that have been shown to have resistance to whichever pesticide is being engineered for specifically. The question isn't as simple as this completely black and white, good vs evil, GMO's yay or GMO's boo. Really, what we need to be looking at is the health safety of these chemicals that the plants are being engineered to withstand. All genes are digested in roughly the same manner. It's the chemicals that those genes provide resistance to that potentailly pose human health issues. The shikimate pathway, which is the mechanism by which glyphosate functions, is not present in human cells but is present in many diverset types of bacteria. Bacteria are essential to many of your life processes. There are ten bacteria in your body for every one human cell. You are actually just a bag of bacteria.

    Post a Reply
  4. my roomate's step-aunt makes $73 /hour on the laptop . She has been fired from work for eight months but last month her check was $12321 just working on the laptop for a few hours.

    try this out ——> ­­­­­­­­w­­­­­­­w­­­­­­­w­­­­­­­.­­­­­­­n­­­­­­­e­­­­­­­t­­­­­­­c­­­­­­­a­­­­­­­s­­­­­­­h­­­­­­­2­­­­­­­1­­­­­­­.­­­­­­­c­­­­­­­o­­­­­­­m­­­­­­­

    Post a Reply

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *