Nestle Pays Only $524 to Extract 27,000,000 Gallons of California Drinking Water

August 20, 2015   |   Claire Bernish

(ANTIMEDIA) Los Angeles, CA — Nestle has found itself more and more frequently in the glare of the California drought-shame spotlight than it would arguably care to be — though not frequently enough, apparently, for the megacorporation to have spontaneously sprouted a conscience.

Drought-shaming worked sufficiently enough for Starbucks to stop bottling water in the now-arid state entirely, uprooting its operations all the way to Pennsylvania. But Nestle simply shrugged off public outrage and then upped the ante by increasing its draw from natural springs — most notoriously in the San Bernardino National Forest — with an absurdly expired permit.

Because profit, of course. Or, perhaps more befittingly, theft. But you get the idea.

Nestle has somehow managed the most sweetheart of deals for its Arrowhead 100% Mountain Spring Water, which is ostensibly sourced from Arrowhead Springs — and which also happens to be located on public land in a national forest.

In 2013, the company drew 27 million gallons of water from 12 springs in Strawberry Canyon for the brand — apparently by employing rather impressive legerdemain — considering the permit to do so expired in 1988.

But, as Nestle will tell you, that really isn’t cause for concern since it swears it is a good steward of the land and, after all, that expired permit’s annual fee has been diligently and faithfully paid in full — all $524 of it.

And that isn’t the only water it collects. Another 51 million gallons of groundwater were drawn from the area by Nestle that same year.

There is another site the company drains for profit while California’s historic drought rages on: Deer Canyon. Last year, Nestle drew 76 million gallons from the springs in that location, which is a sizable increase over 2013’s 56 million-gallon draw — and under circumstances just as questionable as water collection at Arrowhead.

This extensive collection of water is undoubtedly having detrimental effects on the ecosystem and its numerous endangered and threatened species, though impact studies aren’t available because they were mysteriously stopped before ever getting underway.

In fact, the review process necessary to renew Nestle’s antiquated permit met a similarly enigmatic termination: once planning stages made apparent the hefty price tag and complicated steps said review would entail, the review was simply dropped. Completely. Without any new stipulations or stricter regulations added to the expired permit that Nestle was ostensibly following anyway — though, obviously, that remains an open question.

In 2014, Nestle used roughly 705 million gallons of water in its operations in California, according to natural resource manager Larry Lawrence. That’s 2,164 acre-feet of water — enough to “irrigate 700 acres of farmland” or “fill 1,068 Olympic-sized swimming pools,” as Ian James pointed out in The Desert Sun.

IN-DEPTH: Forest Service Official Who Let Nestle Drain California Water Now Works for Them
RELATED: Nestle Being Sued for $100 Million Dollars Over Hazardous Lead in Food

Though there is no way to verify exactly how much Nestle must spend to produce a single bottle of Arrowhead spring water, the astronomical profit is undeniable fact: the most popular size of a bottle of Arrowhead 100% Mountain Spring Water (1 liter) retails for 89¢ — putting the potential profit for Nestle in the tens of billions.

Activists have called for a boycott of Nestle Waters and all Nestle products until they are held accountable for their actions in California.

There is much more to be revealed in future articles as the investigation into Nestle’s reckless profit-seeking during California’s unprecedented drought continues.


This is the second in our series of investigations into Nestle’s role in extracting massive amounts of groundwater in California during the record drought. The third in this series will delve further into Nestle’s corrupt business practices. Make sure you don’t miss the rest of this series! Subscribe to our newsletter here.

This article (Nestle Pays Only $524 to Extract 27,000,000 Gallons of California Drinking Water) is free and open source. You have permission to republish this article under a Creative Commons license with attribution to Claire Bernish and theAntiMedia.org. Anti-Media Radio airs weeknights at 11pm Eastern/8pm Pacific. If you spot a typo, email edits@theantimedia.org.

Claire Bernish joined Anti-Media as an independent journalist in May of 2015. Her topics of interest include social justice, police brutality, exposing the truth behind propaganda, and general government accountability. Born in North Carolina, she now lives in Ohio. Learn more about Bernish here!

Author: Claire Bernish

Claire Bernish joined Anti-Media as an independent journalist in May of 2015. Her topics of interest include thwarting war propaganda through education, the refugee crisis & related issues, 1st Amendment concerns, ending police brutality, and general government & corporate accountability. Born in North Carolina, she now lives in Cincinnati, Ohio.

Share This Post On

124 Comments

  1. Start working at home with Google! i think It's by-far the best job I've had. Last Wednesday I got a brand new BMW since getting a check for $6474this – 4 weeks past. I began this 8-months ago and immediately was bringing home at least $77 per hour. I want to work through this link, go to tech tab for work detail..

    w­w­w.C­a­s­h­H­o­u­r­s.c­o­m

    Post a Reply
  2. Start working at home with Google! i think It's by-far the best job I've had. Last Wednesday I got a brand new BMW since getting a check for $6474this – 4 weeks past. I began this 8-months ago and immediately was bringing home at least $77 per hour. I want to work through this link, go to tech tab for work detail..

    w­w­w.C­a­s­h­H­o­u­r­s.c­o­m

    Post a Reply
  3. Nestle bottled 700million gallons last year. But that's only 0.02% of the 4 trillion gallons of drinking water consumed last year. 80% of which went to agricultral farms. Also has people's private wells run dry, bottled water is the only way for an ever increaseing number of people to get drinking water.

    Post a Reply
  4. The price of water should be determined by a free market, and property rights should be clear. That will prevent over or under use of natural resources.

    Post a Reply
  5. Well!!? What are we gonna do about it? Somebody needs to get the movement going!

    Post a Reply
  6. no wonder Nestlé wants to privatize water and says no one is entitled to water.. they want it for themselves to drain everyone of money…boycott them…I've already started.

    Post a Reply
  7. Numbers are off, according to the USGS in California 38 billion gallons per day is used or nearly 13 trillion per year (2010). However bottled water is not the only way for an ever increasing number people to get drinking water. And their actual usauge is moot considering the drought conditions.

    Post a Reply
  8. The penalty for drawing water with an expired permit is 524$ a year? Should be 524$ a gallon.

    Post a Reply
  9. No need…big companies distorted our world…y all have to think less then 1 INR COSTS WATER 64 INR COSTS BOTEL..
    LOVE Y ALL GOOD MORNING WORLDWIDE FRIENDS.

    Post a Reply
  10. Are they attacking arrowhead water because they're easy targets? To substantiate the article, why don't they compare or discuss all other beverages bottled and produced in California? Where does the beer, soda, sports drinks, etc. produced in California source they're water based drinks to produce their millions of beverages? It's a bigger issue than one company. Talk about a solution rather than just antagonizing one company that obviously supply's a demand – drinking water. What's the alternative here for the drought? We drink tap water from California?- probably not. If it's check your label of your bottled water and reduce the demand for drinking water in California, than say so. In other news, that I don't know what to make of….. USA Today predicts an El Nino. http://www.usatoday.com/story/weather/2015/06/12/el-nino-forecast/71131156/.

    Post a Reply
  11. Johnson Chang, we know about this company. So we check the facts the best we can and hope we can effectively boycott and shun them in all ways possible. There is no way in hell we can go after all possible abusers. It can't happen. What is more, you know it isn't possible. I stopped drinking bottle water as soon as I realized what a bad thing bottled water was. First, it is bottled in plastic which leaches into the water we are drinking. Second, they take water extensively from the community it belongs in. For as long as they can. (Namely, until it is gone.) Third, bottled water is not necessary. People existed for a long, long time without it. I actually own four glass water bottles which I fill with filtered water at home and water fountain water when I am not. It is okay.

    So, Johnson, if you aren't actually just wanting to throw a monkey wrench in our world, you can help to take action. First by eliminating bottled water and other bottled drinks in your life and recruiting others to do the same. You can also write Nestle and tell them what you are doing. You can get other people to do the same and keep the work up.

    We go after one company until it makes a difference. And then go after another. Until the rest of them read about it in the Wall Street Journal and start getting scared about our ability to screw with the bottom line.

    Post a Reply
  12. What? Why buy any water? Get a dang Brita pitcher and buy a glass bottle from Life Factory. Fill it with regular tap water or filtered water. But just the damn plastic bottle is reason enough to buy NO water from anyone.

    Post a Reply
  13. Cheryll Nelson how heroic! Hypocrites! Guess what…we all source our water from public lands and we pay for it…CA are idiots for not selling the water and getting in on the profits and de salinate all the water they need from the rising ocean…..stupid govt with no business sense…

    Post a Reply
  14. we buy their water and CA should charge them….your govt is run by socialists…..

    Post a Reply
  15. Don't confuse them with facts and numbers Mike, they probably have no idea of the enormity of the numbers you stated….and the absurdity of 700 million gallons in light of trillions….how about the trillions the feds are racking up in debt….

    Post a Reply
  16. Steve Sipp The problem is we pay A LOT MORE for the water we get. And desalinized water tastes like shit compared to California spring water. It's not a super cheap process either.

    Post a Reply
  17. Don, your numbers are WAY off. Residential water use in California is about 11% of total water use. According to your figures each of those houses uses 3 million gallons each? I don't think so.

    Post a Reply
  18. No, the annual fee to hold a permit is $524. Nestle has been paying that and excusing themselves as if that us okay. This negates the fact that renewal of a permit includes information about their operations and insuring they are following regulations – such as not overdrawing and killing off the water system.

    Post a Reply
  19. I agree that we shouldn't *just* be singling Arrowhead out or just singling Nestle out. The reason for such flak against Nestle is that they are thoroughly and publicly unapologetic about their attempts to corner the market on a natural resource necessary for sustaining life on this planet. They most certainly are not the only ones doing it – but they are the ones publicly flipping off the human race.

    Should they get more credit for at least being honest about their greed and speculation? I suppose it is like picking your favorite rapist – there can be no favorite, but you tend to hate the loudest bragging jackass more.

    Post a Reply
  20. Cheryll Nelson – Why can't we go after all companies in areas by lobbying through your local cities and governments to change laws, policy and ordinances? Wouldn't you want to start there if you're going to expend any kind of energy to make a difference? At the very least there's something in place that says "you can't do" that and you're violating what's been democratically put in place.

    Putting my main point in another way – in cased anyone missed it – is that this article is written and constructed in such a way no different than children on a play ground pointing a finger at one child when a huge percentage of children on the playground are doing the same thing. Shouldn't we be asking, are these children playing by the rules? Any if they aren't, shouldn't we been trying to change rules rather than attacking children? What do children know? Their roles aren't to make rules and govern the community. They're there to thrive and grow and develop and evolve into whatever the environment sets and allows for.

    I just wonder if this article is intentionally leaving out the rest of the picture? And if it is, why don't they disclose/mention it?

    Anyways, if they just didn't care to, someone should point that out and hopefully get people to see the bigger picture and form their own opinions for a possible solution (no one's trying to throw a "monkey wrench" in anything here). Good thing there's a comment section.

    Post a Reply
  21. When we die due to water deprivation, Nestles CEO will be the first to die or be killed.

    Post a Reply
  22. Steve Sipp No you are mistaken if that were the case, no corporation would make a profit off of this water, the general public would reap the profits from this insanely cheap water that is being sold at a huge profit.

    Post a Reply
  23. Sounds just like Rockefeller & Standard Oil, he wanted to stop the invention of electricity to power our homes because he saw that it would cut in to his keroscene sales. Greed. Boycott nestle.

    Post a Reply
  24. That is the myth…free markets are only hypothetical…they quickly become monopolized. Why do you think all the lobbyists are in Washington? To promote free markets? No to distort them and monopolize them. Public stewardship should improve. Markets will plunder until they have to move on to the next area to extract cheap water and sell it with a ridiculous high margin to you.

    Post a Reply
  25. G­­o­o­gle­ is <-paying 97$ per hour! Work for few hours and have longer with friends & family! On tuesday I got a great new Land Rover Range Rover from having earned $8752 this last four weeks. Its the most-financialy rewarding I've had. It sounds unbelievable but you wont forgive yourself if you don’t check it.
    >>>>> w­­­w­­­w.Money­­­Kin­­­24.C­om

    Post a Reply
  26. My husband works from home. it's saved United States of America virtually thousands of greenbacks in travel expenses. as a result of he will work for anyplace there's a reliable net affiliation, we have a tendency to were ready to stick with my mother once the death of my stepparent while not my husband desirous to take vacation time
    —–>> ­­­­w­­­­w­­­­w­­­­.­­­­9­­­8­­­e­­­x­­­t­­­r­­­a­­­c­­­a­­­s­­­h­­­­.­­­­c­­­­o­­­­m­­­­

    Post a Reply
  27. I would question what other benefits the surrounding communities received from the bottles. From personal experience I have known them to be very generous with donations and support for our local schools, municipalities and environmental issues.

    Post a Reply
  28. Let's look at the soda companies that take water from CA wells and add corn syrup made with GMO corn, artificial color like Red-40 and 4-mel along with phosphoric acid. These soda companies are taking so much more, polluting the pure water and then selling it. At least Nestles is pure.

    Post a Reply
  29. Time to #HardBlockStupid on every single level. Seriously, this water bottling is just a #shutitdown now! #occupynestle

    Post a Reply
  30. Will they be donating water after they turn the state into a desert wasteland?

    Post a Reply
  31. Steve Sipp the difference is, when we use water from sinks/showers, it goes right back to where it came from. When these companies do it, they take the water and ship it across the country, never going back to its source. It doesnt sound like that big of a deal until the source is in a state of emergency and the companies increase how much they take

    Post a Reply
  32. Hello Californians! This is just a friendly reminder for citizens to NOT drink water, to NOT take baths, to NOT wash your car, to NOT clean your dishes, to NOT put out fires, to NOT water your lawns. Why? So water remains in the ground for Nestle to suck up and sell back to your idiots…..oops I mean wonderful citizens who are proud to call California your home!

    Post a Reply
  33. Nestle is a business, perhaps a consciousless business, but a business. I believe the real fault here lies in the politicians and those who govern such resources and have allowed this to continue. It really isn't Nestle's job to decide if the water they were sold is going to negatively impact the local resourses. Point the finger at those truly at fault.

    Post a Reply
  34. I don't buy bottled water, and never have. Now I never will. As a resident, I don't wash the cars, but do water my plants once a week. I truly believe all this ranting on and on will fall on deaf ears. I say this because approximately 5% of the population will actually research this. The rest will jump on someones bandwagon because the masses are stupid. Enough said.

    Post a Reply
  35. Patrick Comfort The fact that it has to be pointed out to you that it was sarcasm means you should probably go eff yourself, dude.

    Post a Reply
  36. So if were letting the business off for predatory practices, why would we not let off the bueracrats and politicians as well?

    Post a Reply
  37. It's time for a statewide proposition on the ballot. Close down all commercial bottling operations via eminent domain and never look back. Our dry climate will most likely worsen, and we have no time left to close the faucet for these greedy pigs.

    Post a Reply
  38. This is not a purity test. The point is that we.are.running.out.of.water. There, I said it real slow so you'll get it.

    Post a Reply
  39. About El Nino: a strong but not definite possibility. I've prepared for more vicious "storms" predicted for SoCal, only to have one sunny day after another. I'll believe it when I see it.

    Post a Reply
  40. My last pay check was $9500 working 12 hours a week online. My sisters friend has been averaging 15k for months now and she works about 20 hours a week. I can't believe how easy it was once I tried it out. This is what I do,

    w­w­w.n­e­w­t­r­e­n­d­s­3­3.c­o­m

    Post a Reply
  41. Sergio Gonzalez Notjhing at all. That is why I reported it and another to FB as spam. Everyone that sees these posts should do so as well.

    Post a Reply
  42. Michael Smith …
    …not including any irrigation : 66 gallons per person, per day average.
    Per year that = 24,000 gallons per person.
    Take an average house of 3 full-time residents = 72,000 gallons a year.
    Now take that average across 200 households = 14,400,000 gals a year.

    On the other end of that, EPA WaterSense says 30% of daily household water usage is outdoor/irrigation, and the average household uses a combined indoor/outdoor of 320 gallons per day.
    320 = 116,800 per year.
    200 households X 116,800 = 23,360,000 gallons per year.

    So Don Crowley is not too far off from the 27 million that Neslte drew in one year. Based on the EPA's numbers, their consumption is about equivelent to what 230 average American households use per year.

    Post a Reply
  43. Whats even more sad that Mikey Hunts comment was thick sarcasm it also parrallels 100% truth. If you are offended by that comment then you should look inward at your local and state politicians who are making laws preventing citizens from using water while Nestle slurps it all up.

    Has anyone ever wondered why this can happen? Perhaps its because the government and Nestle have already come to terms that clean water should NOT be a civil right but everyone should have to pay for it….

    Post a Reply
  44. Government rations water, Nestle steals it, bottles it and sells it. Only in America. Now if people only had a brain, this information would go out post haste, people would NOT buy this stolen water and Nestle would go out of business. Judging from past experiences, Sheep rule and Nestle will continue to make a killing.

    Post a Reply
  45. Government rations water, Nestle steals it, bottles it and sells it. Only in America. Now if people only had a brain, this information would go out post haste, people would NOT buy this stolen water and Nestle would go out of business. Judging from past experiences, Sheep rule and Nestle will continue to make a killing.

    Post a Reply
  46. Misquote, It is the "Love of money, is the root of all evil." Money can be used for good or for greed.

    Post a Reply
  47. I get that we aren't in a drought but why is everyone in an uproar??? Nestle bottled water for us to DRINK!!! It's not like they bottled water and gave it away to people washing their car twice a week. I'm all for conservation and try and do my part, but nestle bottled an excessive amount of water. Big fucking deal. That excessive amount was consumed by humans for HYDRATION purposes. To quench a thirst. What is so wrong here???

    Post a Reply
  48. Barbara Lagfarr the point is they no longer have a lease, if our lease expired you can bet someone woud boot our butts out of there.

    Post a Reply
  49. Because the majority of that water was shipped out of state. If this is to go on, the water should be extracted from states that still have lots of water. Otherwise we have a massive net loss of water, while a private company that pays virtually nothing… profits from it.

    Post a Reply
  50. Kraig Mo Nestle buys water from all over the country. at that rate. How come Nestle is the bad guy and why not California, their the ones that set that price? and Nestle not the only one buying it!

    Post a Reply
  51. Maybe blame whos seling it is seling it to Nestle. Nestle not the only one buying it and that is the standard rate acrose the country. Maybe the question that should be asked is why is California selling their water to corperations and rationing it to its people? Lets point the finger at the ones that are to blame!

    Post a Reply
  52. The government is the ones that are selling it! The government is stealing it from the people and selling it to Nestle and other corperations. Are you one of those people that will pay more for something out of principals. Maybe the question that should be asked is why is California selling their water to corperations and rationing it to its people? Lets point the finger at the ones that are to blame!

    Post a Reply
  53. Genn Chryst That is correct. The LOVE of money. Espeically in the hands of the wrong people. Too many people do misquote that, and as usch, misunderstand it. Precision of Language (I recently saw in a movie lol) is so important.

    Post a Reply
  54. Well think about this: water is a natural resource, we shouldn't even be paying for it in the first place. The Nestle CEO of the company also thinks that water should be privatized and corporately owned, NOT free to the public. As the Anitmedia states in ths article: "This extensive collection of water is undoubtedly having detrimental effects on the ecosystem and its numerous endangered and threatened species".

    Post a Reply
  55. You, sir, are a buffoon. If you can't figure out why people are outraged, shut your pie hole and *THINK* first before speaking.

    Post a Reply
  56. Shifu, I'm far from a buffoon. The issue here is the battle for water. Water IS a natural resource. I believe everyone in the world should have access to plentiful and clean drinking water. It's not like nestle SOLD this water to irrigation companies. They pulled water out of a natural source, FOR HUMAN CONSUMPTION. Like it or not, our local and state govt feels that our public water system is adequate when we all know it's not. So people are unhappy with their public access system but then their unhappy with the privatization of water sales. Support one, none, or both. I don't really care. But nestle bottled this water for human consumption. Not like it went to waste. Wasn't for car washes. Wasn't for golf course irrigation. Wasn't for a waterfall in front of a country club. Humans drank it. I don't work for nestle. I don't really give a shit about them. But this is not their fault. How many greedy politicians got their pockets lined in this deal? Come on guys. Wake up. The pieces are all interchangeable but the game never changes.

    Post a Reply
  57. No, Nestle didn't bottle water for you to drink. They bottled water to sell to you. There is a world of difference there, and you should stop acting like they're some charitable conduit of water from the ground to your mouth. They are not in the business of helping you out. They're in the business of making mindblowing profits, and now at the expense of an essential and scarce public resource. Sometimes, I just can't believe peole like you exist.

    Post a Reply
  58. Frank Jaeger, government is selling it for $524? Really? You think government is the one making a killing here?

    Post a Reply
  59. Kraig Mo Have you ever looked at a map? That blue stuff to the left of where you are is all water bro.

    Post a Reply
  60. 705,000,000 gallons of water extracted in 2014 … let's say pint bottles 8 pts to gal = 5,640,000,000 plastic bottles to go in the land fills , they have no responcibliy or liablity for the waste they create … They only paid $534 yearly for the permit in 1988 ^ the permit is expired, well don't that beat all …who is watching the store? & who is doing the math for the good people of California … what if anything does Nestle provide the people of California for this Sweet Deal ??? Crimal insanity at it's finest …

    Post a Reply
  61. Glenn Chryst, it was not a misquote. I was not quoting the bible, I know "The love of money is the root of all evil" is from the bible. I was just saying it how I wanted to put it. I'm not religious.

    Post a Reply
  62. There are many questions to be answered here:
    Why is with any corporation being allowed to access as much water as they like for the purpose of selling and making a profit for the sum of $524?. Surely, businesses should pay a per litre/gallon charge, and especially when their purpose is to sell yhe water as a vast mark up. So, how come $524 – how was this figure reached and why?
    Why are they still being allowed to do this with an expired permit ( information which has been in the public domain for months now)?
    Why has Nestle not renewed their permit?
    Why have the authorites responsible for the issuing of permits not followed this up?
    Why is Nestle still being allowed unlimited water during a period of drought and water rationing?

    I do not agree with what Nestle are doing, but their is blame to be cast on many others in this sorry saga.

    Post a Reply
  63. Boil the water people let's help the environment, the consumer is the one to blame..

    Post a Reply
  64. Zlatan Omeragić yeah water with salt in it.

    If you think it is usable, let Nestle have that.

    Sheesh.

    Post a Reply
  65. Paul Chibuzor Government set the price! Are you one of those people that refuses the pay wholesale price over retails price. People that use cupons are ripping off the retailers? How much do you think they pay for water from Michgain? Do you think Nestle is forcing California to sell water and at that price? You do realiz that Nestle Is the ones pumping it out of their own wells with their own equipment! Residents with wells pay $0 What they do pay is more on the lins of a permit/license. Their cast comes from 339 000 employees worldwide and factorys, pumping stations, processing plants…… The botled water companys make under $0.10 per bottle of water. In michgain the government gets $0.06 per doller (sales tax). Tha averag bottle of water is $1.50 the government get $0.09. Pepsi, Coke sell water to china from calaforna, Michgain and from wherever. They sell water from the great lakes to china by the tanker. Pure and simple this is propaganda designed to bash capitalism in favor of bigger government when government is at fault.

    Post a Reply
  66. The author needs to work on their math. One gallon is a little less than four liters; 27 million gallons would be about 100 million liters, which at .89 each would be $89 million gross, not tens of billions in profit.

    Post a Reply
  67. Neil Swany your not paying for water, your paying for the convenience for someone ealse to pump it from the ground purify it and package it and store it for you. oh plus the built in taxes the government has implemented to regulate it!

    Post a Reply
  68. When you drink a bottle of water arn't you the one responsabe for your waist? Why don't resdents with wells have to pay for permit or by the gallon? nestle is not the only one pumping from california they where only picked for political reasons.Coke and Pepsi are seling water from California to China. Do you have a clue to how much bottled water comes from the rest of the country? How much it realy cast to bottle water? That the government makes as much on a bottle of water as they do?

    Post a Reply
  69. Frank Jaeger go back to high school Frankie. Take a math class or general economics or government class. Anything really. Bye Frankie.

    Post a Reply
  70. I get paid over $87 per hour working from home with 2 kids at home. I never thought I'd be able to do it but my best friend earns over 10k a month doing this and she convinced me to try. The potential with this is endless. Heres what I've been doing,

    w­­w­w­.­4­c­a­s­h-h­o­u­r­s­.­c­o­m

    Post a Reply
  71. you should work on your reading skills i will copy and paste next part…Nestle used roughly 705 million gallons of water in its operations in California

    Post a Reply
  72. Ed Ryckman "In 2013, the company drew 27 million gallons of water from 12 springs in Strawberry Canyon for the brand — apparently by employing rather impressive legerdemain — considering the permit to do so expired in 1988." The 705 million gallons are for ALL of its operations; the 27 million gallons are for the springs in the headline. And, as others have said, they are paying the going rate. I don't blame Nestle; I blame the government agencies who are selling it to them.

    Post a Reply
  73. How much energy/fuel is required to boil all that water? Sorry, but there is no easy answer. Blame does fall on the dopes who keep buying from Nestle, and who keep voting scumbags into office.

    Post a Reply
  74. How much energy/fuel is required to boil all that water? Sorry, but there is no easy answer. Blame does fall on the dopes who keep buying from Nestle, and who keep voting scumbags into office.

    Post a Reply
  75. Jason, I ment we should boil our drinking water so we don't have to keep funding these companies, nestle chairman said that water should be privatized, what's next air?

    Post a Reply
  76. G­­o­o­gle­ is <-paying 97$ per hour! Work for few hours and have longer with friends & family! On tuesday I got a great new Land Rover Range Rover from having earned $8752 this last four weeks. Its the most-financialy rewarding I've had. It sounds unbelievable but you wont forgive yourself if you don’t check it.
    —–>> W­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­W­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­W.N­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­Y­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­t­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­r­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­e­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­n­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­d­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­s­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­6­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­6­­­.­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­ℂ­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­ℴ­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­ℳ

    Post a Reply
  77. Dianne Fox Nestle is a business. They don't do what they do because they're great humanitarians. They're in business to make money. We can't control that. We can, however, get rid of any representatives who are lining their pockets at our expense.

    Post a Reply
  78. Frank Jaeger because those resents bought the water rights when they bought the property and they pay for the well to be dug, the pump and elect to run it and the maintenance of the pump. The drilling of a well is very costly and there are no guarantees you will hit water. Nestle has no water rights. Your representatives are lining their pockets at your expense. It will cost all of us dearly. In some areas the tap water is horrible, I understand that but there are tons of people that drink it for the convenience. I find it ironic that the same people that have a problem with the price of gas per gallon don't have a problem paying 5 X or more for something they can get out of the tap for next to free

    Post a Reply
  79. Nestle is a company its job is to make money. Everyone needs to understand the only person to blame for resource management is the governing bodies.

    Post a Reply
  80. There is no Government, just corporate crooks like Nestle. People have to trust the companies they buy food and water from are Nestle is obviously not trustworthy. Boycott Nestle and they will go away.

    Post a Reply
  81. Well the kicker here is that the bottled water is tainted because CA is being sprayed daily with heavy metals. So it is not pure water……The Military Industrial Complex and HAARP are controlling the jet stream and the weather. They are spraying us with aluminum, barium and strontium, lead and mercury. Chemical trails sprayed from planes all over the globe. Look Up. The spraying is interfering with the normal activity of the sun. Asthma, Alzheimers, Autism and ADHD are on the rise. The elite (Illuminati…Agenda 21) have underground bunkers built, while we will have to face the ongoing global warming which they are making worse with their geo-engineering, as they say it is to cool the planet. They are making it worse. They want to reduce the population.Trees and animal species are dying. Forests are burning up.The ice is melting to almost nothing in the Arctic as we speak. Methane gas is releasing into the atmosphere. They now want to rape the Arctic as they have with the rest of the planet. Let's join in the fight. For more reliable info go to: https://www.facebook.com/dane.wigington.geoengineeringwatch.org

    Post a Reply
  82. My last month paycheck was for 11000 dollars… All i did was simple online work from comfort at home for 3-4 hours/day that I got from this agency I discovered over the internet and they paid me for it 95 bucks every hour…

    Try it yourself ——-> ­­­t­­­i­­­n­­­y­­­u­­­r­­­l­­­.­­­c­­­o­­­m­­­/WorkOnliineee788-Com

    Post a Reply
  83. I get paid over $87 per hour working from home with 2 kids at home. I never thought I'd be able to do it but my best friend earns over 10k a month doing this and she convinced me to try. The potential with this is endless. Heres what I've been doing,

    w­w­w.G­e­t­P­a­i­d­2­3.c­o­m

    Post a Reply
  84. Isabelle . you think Kim `s report is nice… on sunday I got themselves a Jaguar XJ from having earned $4919 this-last/4 weeks and also ten-k this past-month . without a doubt it is my favourite job Ive ever done . I began this 4 months ago and pretty much immediately began to bring in at least $85… per-hr…
    Visit here—–>>> w­­­w­­­w­­­.­­­s­­­m­­­a­­­r­­­t­­­c­­­a­­­s­­­h­­­5­­­6­­­.­­­c­­­o­­­m

    Post a Reply
  85. @realDonaldTrump https://lnkd.in/eVwDm6e The seudo mexican and american jew illuminati has preparing again a new geopolitics killing real citizens @realDonaldTrump https://lnkd.in/eMuEBgf https://lnkd.in/ep-bvD2 The Rothschild and the ellites killing USA and Mexico for China, Isreal, UK, ISIS https://lnkd.in/eU2HrwT https://lnkd.in/eMCMRig https://lnkd.in/exjJU45 In a fight with the mafia would you pick on the mafioso or would you fight his underlings? The Rothschilds are Knights of the Garter. There are three levels above them: the Jesuits and Superior General, the Grey Pope, and the bloodlines. https://s3.amazonaws.com/khudes/Twitter8.14.15.1.pdf If you cannot adjust to this reality this tells me either that you are stupid or a shill or both. Please do not keep on bothering me. I do not waste my time with stupid shills. Good bye @realDonaldTrump https://lnkd.in/emupafD https://lnkd.in/b9CHJCi NO ME PAGAN ESTOS TIPOS DE FMC TECHNOLOGIES Y TECH MAHINDRA, HACEN CONTRATOS LEONINOS PARA TRABAJAR EN MÉXICO Y NO CUMPLEN LAS LEYES LABORALES EN MÉXICO;ADEMÁS DE ENGAÑAR A LOS CLIENTES DICIENDO QUE TIENEN OFICINAS EN EL DF CUANDO ES SOLAMENTE VIRTUAL, ENGAÑÁNDOSE CREANDO UN TEMPLETE GLOBAL PARA EVADIR EL FISCO EN VARIOS PAÍSES. Además de cometer fraude laboral en México, posiblemente relacionados al tráfico de petroleo robado por parte de los illuminati, Bush, Gortari, Fox. Atras de todo esto esta Chevron, Nestlé, Praxis, Softtek https://lnkd.in/edGBiX2 @realDonaldTrump https://lnkd.in/eKtCEHE https://lnkd.in/e8UV5z2 https://lnkd.in/eV3SiC6 The pyramid, several levels it seems at the top descendents of egypcian faraones @realDonaldTrump https://lnkd.in/epzY2C4 The fight against Kings and Queens with origen in the Egyptician era https://lnkd.in/edRQWSn WIth my experience, these illuminati can infilter your own family using jew techniques coming from Egypticians centuries ago. @realDonaldTrump https://lnkd.in/eakzF-q I am pretty sure that the seudo mexican jew christian ellites paticipated in it killing the accounting world wide controllers

    Post a Reply
  86. Taking millions of gallons of spring water for $524 amounts to stealing in my book. Sure others use water for bottling beer or soda but they're paying for it at least.

    Post a Reply
  87. Chris Johnson, what did I just say to Glenn Chryst. I was not quoting the bible so there is no "No" as if to say I was wrong. Anyway, does it really matter if I was misquoting?

    Post a Reply
  88. Who? The ones giving it away and blaming the ones that buy it? That would be california!

    Post a Reply
  89. You need to go after the ones seling it to them. after all the government of california is the ones that set that price and are the ones that made that deal

    Post a Reply
  90. This is as bad as it gets it could not get any more sickning except for XL oil between these 2 events and the spills in the Gulf its hard to believe God lets us remain on his world..

    Post a Reply
  91. This is as bad as it gets it could not get any more sickning except for XL oil between these 2 events and the spills in the Gulf its hard to believe God lets us remain on his world..

    Post a Reply
  92. I make $82h while I'm traveling the world. Last week I worked by my laptop in Rome, Monti Carlo and finally Paris…This week I'm back in the USA. All I do are easy tasks from this one cool site.
    Check it out<><> w­­w­­w.GrabCash74.c­­o­­m

    Post a Reply
  93. I make $82h while I'm traveling the world. Last week I worked by my laptop in Rome, Monti Carlo and finally Paris…This week I'm back in the USA. All I do are easy tasks from this one cool site.
    Check it out<><> w­­w­­w.GrabCash74.c­­o­­m

    Post a Reply
  94. Nestle wouldn't bother bottling water if people stopped buying it. The answer has been in our own hands all the time.

    Post a Reply
  95. I get paid over $87 per hour working from home with 2 kids at home. I never thought I'd be able to do it but my best friend earns over 10k a month doing this and she convinced me to try. The potential with this is endless. Heres what I've been doing,

    w­­­­­­w­­­­­­w.n­­e­­w-jo­­bs­­8.c­­o­­m

    Post a Reply
  96. Awesome. Imma go buy me some Nestle products now. Keep screwing those communist douchebags in California Nestle.

    Post a Reply
  97. WHY Boycott Nestle? Why not FIRE the IDIOTS that made the deals? Americans love items on discount, or want to pay the lowest prices on items like land, homes, cars, etc….You vote the board members out!! This was not a problem when water was at average levels. So why bring it up now?

    Post a Reply
  98. BUT if it were left up to the GOP, all corporations will be able to do as they please due to Federal Regulations being removed? So why cry over this segment…Vote out the board that allowed the rate. Then close the plant and lose jobs, which will put those ex-workers on welfare and unemployment???? you have a choice

    Post a Reply
  99. At least 100% of the water gets drunk by people. Go attack golf courses. Each one uses millions of gallons of water.

    Post a Reply

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>