‘New California’ Wants to Break Away From ‘Tyranny’ of California, Create 51st State

(ANTIMEDIA) California – Over the years, there have been several secession efforts in California aimed away at breaking away from the U.S. government, including one that gained steam following Donald Trump’s election in 2016. So far, none have been successful, but a new declaration from rural communities are now seeking independence not from the U.S., but from California itself.

The State of New California declared its independence from the Golden State this week, citing Article IV, Section 3 of the U.S. Constitution as well as the Declaration of Independence. “The current state of California has become governed by a tyranny, which rivals those expressed in the above documents,” the movement writes.

The founders of the new proposed state are committed to following the government’s rules.

“We have to demonstrate that we can govern ourselves before we are allowed to govern,” said founder Tom Reed.

According to the group’s press release, “After years of over taxation, regulation, and mono party politics the State of California and many of it’s [sic] 58 Counties have become ungovernable.” They cite a decline in the quality of essential services, including “education, law enforcement, fire protection, transportation, housing, health care, taxation, voter rights, banking, state pension systems, prisons, state parks, water resource management, home ownership, infrastructure and many more.”

There’s something wrong when you have a rural county such as this one, and you go down to Orange County which is mostly urban, and it has the same set of problems, and it happens because of how the state is being governed and taxed,” said founder Robert Paul Preston.

The group asserts it is the “Duty of the People who are suffering the long train of abuses and usurpations at the hands of a tyrannical government to abolish and make New a Government by the People and for the People under GOD.”

Despite the fact that many of their grievances also apply to the U.S. government, the New California effort is only concerned with separating from the coastal urban regions of the state.

To be sure, the California government is highly corrupt and inefficient. To name just a few examples, the state legislature is overwhelmed by special interests, the debt stands at $283.3 billion as of last year, the government has imposed massive taxes on cannabis amid legalization, and agencies throughout the state have failed to represent the people, often siding with corporations that have wreaked havoc on communities and the environment.

Nevertheless, if escaping tyranny is the goal, remaining under the rule of U.S. government may not solve the problem. The newest effort does, however, highlight growing divisions within American society, whether between broad regions of the United States or other segments, such as rural versus urban demographics. These growing divides suggest centralized authority and governance is increasingly difficult to maintain, impractical, and often sows internal contempt.

Regardless, the New California proposal is in its earliest stages, and its organizers told CBS-Sacramentothey won’t be prepared to start engaging with the state legislature for another ten to eighteen months. They would need the approval of both the California and U.S. governments and are currently working to gain the interest of at least 40 counties.

Creative Commons / Anti-Media / Report a typo

Since you’re here…

…We have a small favor to ask. Fewer and fewer people are seeing Anti-Media articles as social media sites crack down on us, and advertising revenues across the board are quickly declining. However, unlike many news organizations, we haven’t put up a paywall because we value open and accessible journalism over profit — but at this point, we’re barely even breaking even. Hopefully, you can see why we need to ask for your help. Anti-Media’s independent journalism and analysis takes substantial time, resources, and effort to produce, but we do it because we believe in our message and hope you do, too.

If everyone who reads our reporting and finds value in it helps fund it, our future can be much more secure. For as little as $1 and a minute of your time, you can support Anti-Media. Thank you. Click here to support us




You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Brad Fuller

    It appears my comment is awaiting “moderation” as I mentioned a certain movement that seeks to reestablish the Republic in my response to the actions by disgruntled Republicans mentioned in this article. Bye bye Anti-Media

  • Melinda McCracken

    I live in Sacramento, California. This division would be absolutely unacceptable to me. I agree that the state is too large and smaller states would be easier to govern.

    However, this division would mean that old California would have no source of water for our cities without buying it and being subject to regulation of it from the new state. One of the reasons the inland counties are trying to do this is that the farmers don’t like having to share water with the cities. With the ongoing threat of drought, we need to come up with a better system of supply and not penalize the residents of cities and towns with exorbitant prices, which is no doubt what the farmers would do in an effort to cut down usage by the rest of us. Or they would just ration so little that the cities and towns would be unable to provide even a minimum amount of water to the residents and businesses. Either way, it would create an untenable situation.

    They need to go back to the drawing board and come up with a better plan.