Trump Wants to Replace Food Stamps With Food Boxes to Save Money

(COMMONDREAMS— Amid the outcry over President Donald Trump’s proposed 2019 budget—which also calls for massive spending cuts for education, healthcare, and foreign aid—policy experts and anti-hunger groups zeroed in on Tuesday on the administration’s plan to replace food stamps with boxes that would contain foods pre-selected by the Agriculture Department.

Mick Mulvaney, director of the Office of Management and Budget, likened the proposal to Blue Apron, the popular meal-delivery service. But critics noted that the company’s mission of simplifying meal preparation for busy households would be replaced by a bureaucratic attempt to dictate which foods families could have, in the interest of saving money for the government.

“With Blue Apron, you get to pick your meals and decide when they come,” noted journalist Bryce Covert. “And it gives you all the ingredients you need to complete it. Under Trump’s plan, the government decides what you get and when you get it. You have no say. Is your oven off because you couldn’t pay the gas bill? Too bad, you got canned food that needs to be heated up.”

Under Trump’s proposal, families receiving more than $90 in Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits—about 80 percent of eligible families—would receive half of their benefits in the monthly food boxes, which would contain shelf-stable milk, juice, grains, cereals, pasta, peanut butter, beans and canned meat, fruits and vegetables. After receiving the box, the average SNAP household would be left with about $127 per month to buy fresh produce and other foods of their choosing.

Anti-hunger advocates point out that the pre-selected foods would not be suitable for SNAP recipients with special dietary needs.

“It boggles the mind how that would play out,” Kathy Fisher, policy director at Philadelphia’s Coalition Against Hunger, told the Washington Post. “We know SNAP works now, when people can choose what they need. How they would distribute foods to people with specialized diets, or [to people in] rural areas…It’s very expensive and very complicated.”

Others pointed out that the USDA’s proposed name for the packages, “America’s Harvest Box,” is a misnomer.

“This action would not only destabilize attempts to bring more healthy, fresh foods into the homes of America’s food insecure, but would keep dollars out of local grocery stores and farmers markets, which are critical assets to all communities,” Jordan Rasmussen, a policy associate at the Center for Rural Affairs, told Politico.

By Julia Conley / Creative Commons / Common Dreams / Report a typo

This article was chosen for republication based on the interest of our readers. Anti-Media republishes stories from a number of other independent news sources. The views expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not reflect Anti-Media editorial policy.

Since you’re here…

…We have a small favor to ask. Fewer and fewer people are seeing Anti-Media articles as social media sites crack down on us, and advertising revenues across the board are quickly declining. However, unlike many news organizations, we haven’t put up a paywall because we value open and accessible journalism over profit — but at this point, we’re barely even breaking even. Hopefully, you can see why we need to ask for your help. Anti-Media’s independent journalism and analysis takes substantial time, resources, and effort to produce, but we do it because we believe in our message and hope you do, too.

If everyone who reads our reporting and finds value in it helps fund it, our future can be much more secure. For as little as $1 and a minute of your time, you can support Anti-Media. Thank you. Click here to support us




You must be logged in to post a comment.