Saudi Arabia reportedly sent letter to two unidentified countries saying they may cut off trade with those who vote for human rights resolution.
(MEE) — Saudi Arabia issued a threat towards the UN Human Rights Council that if a proposed resolution were to pass, the country may limit trade and diplomatic ties with those who vote in favor of it.
We're revolutionizing the news industry, but we need your help! Click here to get started.
The kingdom reportedly sent a letter to two unidentified countries that said Arab nations “will not accept” a resolution introduced by Canada and the Netherlands.
“Adopting the Netherlands/Canadian draft resolution in the Human Rights Council may negatively affect the bilateral political and economic relations with Saudi Arabia,” the letter read.
The proposed resolution by Canada and the Netherlands “seeks to create a commission of inquiry, similar to one for the conflict in Syria,” according to a New York Times report.
Saudi and other Arab countries have a proposed resolution of their own, which focuses on a domestic investigation “that critics say has failed to hold rights violators to account,” according to an Associated Press report.
UN human rights chief Zeid Ra’ad has previously called for an independent investigation.
The US has not taken sides on which resolution to endorse.
The Saudi-led coalition, which has been waging a war against the Houthis since March 2015, has been repeatedly criticized for attacks on civilians.
More than 8,000 people have been killed, including at least 1,500 children, and millions displaced in the conflict, which has pushed the impoverished country to the brink of famine.
A cholera outbreak has also claimed the lives of more than 1,800 people since April, with 400,000 suspected cases across the country, according to the United Nations and the International Committee of the Red Cross.
The United Nations warned in July that 80 percent of Yemen’s children desperately needed aid in what the organisation called the “largest humanitarian crisis in the world.”
This article was chosen for republication based on the interest of our readers. Anti-Media republishes stories from a number of other independent news sources. The views expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not reflect Anti-Media editorial policy.