The Story You Aren’t Being Told About Iran Capturing Two American Vessels

January 19, 2016   |   admintam

Justin King
January 19, 2016

(TFC) Tehran, Iran – The airwaves in the United States were filled with images of sailors on their knees while a US Navy vessel was searched. Unjustified outrage swept the nation. The US Secretary of Defense blamed the incident on a simple navigation error, however a chain of events leading back to 2009 demonstrates the facts are a little more complicated than first appear. The chain of events leads defense analysts to one unmistakable conclusion: Iran has the ability to disrupt US GPS systems. For western military analysts, the thought is terrifying. The West uses GPS for much more than replacing a compass and a map.

In 2009, Lockheed Martin’s RQ-170 Sentinel showed up on a runway in Kandahar, Afghanistan. The aircraft entered service two years earlier, but the public was unaware. The bat wing styled drone is reminiscent of the Stealth Bomber. The similarities extend beyond the cosmetic, and the RQ-170 is the premier spy drone in the US fleet. This was the drone used to map out Bin Laden’s compound. It was tasked with keeping an eye on Iran’s nuclear program. That’s when things got interesting.

On December 4, 2011 a RQ-170 Sentinel crashed into the Iranian countryside. Iran claimed its electronic warfare unit brought the plane down. The US Department of Defense stated the aircraft was flying over western Afghanistan and crashed near or in Iran. The aircraft was 140 miles inside Iran’s borders. The west laughed at the idea of Iran’s military obtaining the capability to down one the most sophisticated drones in the world. One military official remarked it was like:

“dropping a Ferrari into an ox-cart technology culture.”

They probably shouldn’t have been so quick to laugh. It appears the Iranians didn’t just down the aircraft, they took control of it mid-flight. explained:

“Using its knowledge of the frequency, the engineer claims, Iran intiated its ‘electronic ambush’ by jamming the bird’s communications frequencies, forcing it into auto-pilot.  States the source, ‘By putting noise [jamming] on the communications, you force the bird into autopilot. This is where the bird loses its brain.’

“The team then use a technique known as ‘spoofing’ — sending a false signal for the purposes of obfuscation or other gain.  In this case the signal in questions was the GPS feed, which the drone commonly acquires from several satellites.  By spoofing the GPS feed, Iranian officials were able to convince it that it was in Afghanistan, close to its home base.  At that point the drone’s autopilot functionality kicked in and triggered the landing.  But rather than landing at a U.S. military base, the drone victim instead found itself captured at an Iranian military landing zone.

“Spoofing the GPS is a clever method, as it allows hackers to ‘land on its own where we wanted it to, without having to crack the [encrypted] remote-control signals and communications.’

“While the technique did not require sophistication from a cryptography perspective, it was not entirely trivial, either, as it required precise calculations to be made to give the drone the proper forged distance and find and fine an appropriate altitude landing strip to make sure the drone landed as it did in Afghanistan.  The Iranian engineers knew the details of the landing site, because the drone had been confirmed in grainy photos to be landing at a base in Khandar, Afghanistan.

“Despite the careful calculations, the drone still sustained a dent in its wing and underbody (though it did not have the usual signs of a high-speed collision).  During its press conferences, the Iranian military covered this damage with anti-American banners.

“The engineer explained this damage commenting, ‘If you look at the location where we made it land and the bird’s home base, they both have [almost] the same altitude.  There was a problem [of a few meters] with the exact altitude so the bird’s underbelly was damaged in landing; that’s why it was covered in the broadcast footage.’ The approach echoes an October security conference presentation [PDF] in Chicago, in which ETH Zurich researchers laid out how to use interference and GPS spoofing to more gently down a drone.”

The Aviationist agreed and suggested the US “reconsider their drones’ equipment, countermeasures and combat operation procedures as well as Iran’s electronic and cyberwarfare capabilities.” It should be noted the “ox-cart technology culture” has since reverse engineered the drone.

The gross underestimation of the Iranian military led to the recent incident in the Persian Gulf. The story being repeated in the western press is one of ten sailors getting lost and ending up in Iranian territorial waters (if the outlet mentions that part). According to Secretary of Defense Carter, “All the contributing factors to that we don’t know yet, and we’re still talking to those folks, and we’ll find out more … but they were clearly out of the position that they intended to be in.”

Two boats lost their GPS abilities at the same time, and the Secretary of Defense isn’t sure what happened? A few US outlets, such as the L.A. Times, reported on the other malfunctions during the incident. Both boats lost radio communication and all other communication during the incident. A single vehicle losing its GPS abilities can happen. It’s rare, but it can happen. Two vehicles losing the systems at the same time borders on implausible, but there is still a possibility of it occurring through Murphy’s Law. The loss of all communication equipment and GPS systems on two boats at the same time means one thing: electronic warfare.

The unwillingness to admit the US military has spent billions on a system that has apparently been defeated by Iran is the most likely culprit behind the western media’s attempt to focus on the “ill treatment” of US sailors. Even the L.A. Times, which was willing to report on the communications failures, placed the following quote in a bold offset in the same article:

“The way those sailors were treated was entirely inappropriate. … The U.S. Navy would never demand Iranian sailors hold their hands on their heads and coerce a confession.– James Stavridis, retired U.S. admiral”

The U.S. Navy’s installation at Guantanamo Bay has been the scene of the worst treatment of detainees by the US government in decades. The sailors captured by Iran were not waterboarded, deprived of sleep or food, sexually abused, or otherwise tortured. The United States does not have the moral authority to object to how another nation treats detainees.

The burning question now relates to whether or not Iran’s actions constitute an attack on the U.S. It’s not a simple question. Electronic warfare and cyber warfare have become common place. It is also worth noting the two US vessels were within just a few miles of Farsi Island. Farsi Island is the home of the Revolutionary Guards’ Navy (RGN). The RGN is Iran’s maritime unconventional warfare force. For comparison, imagine a scenario in which a nation that has attacked a US civilian airliner and whose political leaders have constantly threatened war sent two boats to  pass extraordinarily close to the home base of a U.S. Seal Team. The reader can decide if Iran’s actions were appropriate.

The most important takeaway from this incident is to remember the high-tech military of the United States has an exposed vulnerability. It’s a vulnerability that was exploited by Iran. Iran is not a nation many in military circles would see as technologically advanced. The drone warfare system has a fatal flaw. If Iran can exploit it, China and Russia certainly can. Even North Korea has been able to successfully disrupt the GPS system. Beyond simple navigation, the U.S. employs the GPS system to guide missiles. If the Iranians can jam and spoof their way into controlling a drone, it isn’t a huge leap to believe they have the ability, or will soon have the ability, to do the same thing with guided missiles.

It should be noted that GPS jammers are available on the civilian market and have been detected in use inside the United Kingdom. This revelation may also be the reasoning behind the U.S. decision to require drone operators to register their aircraft.

This article (The Story You Aren’t Being Told About Iran Capturing Two American Vessels) originally appeared on The Fifth Column and was used with permission. Tune in! Anti-Media Radio airs Monday through Friday @ 11pm Eastern/8pm Pacific. Help us fix our typos:

Author: admintam

Follow us on Instagram @TheAntiMedia

Share This Post On


  1. @David Yang Fun S fact. JDAM use L1 and L2. Both can be jammed by Prowler. Even when encryption is used JDAM's GPS die like a duck in L1 and L2 jamming.

    Anyway dislike the video for disinformation. Regarding to leaked manual JDAM's military GPS die like a duck. So not all military GPS receivers are jam resistant. I guess none of MIL GPS receivers are jam resistant.

    Post a Reply
  2. Mapping it Bin Laden's compound??? Everything you say is suspect if you support that line of B.S. Pakistan admits that they supplied a look-a- like for that theatre show. And most of the Seals that could tell the truth about the raid conveniently died!

    Post a Reply
  3. A satalite with powerful electrostatic field could disrupt if stationed near enough to the responder sat..

    Post a Reply
  4. I q­ui­­­t wo­­­rk­­­­ing m­­­y de­­s­k jo­­­b an­­d n­­o­w, I st­­­art­­­e­d e­­arn­­­in­­g 9­­5 b­­­­­­uck­­­­­­s ho­­­­ur­­­­­l­y…H­­­­o­w I d­i­d i­­­­­­t? I a­­m f­reelan­­­­­cing o­v­­­­­­­er t­h­­­­­e i­n­t­­­­­­­­­­­­ernet! M­­­y la­­­s­t jo­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­b d­id­­­n't e­­­­­xact­­­­­ly m­­­­­­­­ak­­­­­­e m­­­­­­­­e ha­­­­­­­­­pp­­­­­­y s­­­­­­­­­o I w­­­­­an­t­e­­­­­­d t­­­­­o t­­­­­­­­ak­e a b­­r­e­ak a­­­­nd h­­­av­­­e a f­­­re­­sh s­­tar­­t… A­­­­f­t­e­r 6 y­­­r­s I­t w­­­­as we­­­­­i­rd fo­­r m­e t­o le­­­­­ave m­­y p­­re­­­vi­­­ous j­­­­ob a­n­­­­­d n­­­­­­ow I a­m del­­­igh­ted we­­­r­e i am

    ••••••? ­lllllllllllw­w­w.­ba­nk­no­w­5­4­­.­­c­­o­mllllllllllll

    Post a Reply
  5. My mate's aunt makes $98 consistently on the PC.After earning an average of 19952 Dollars monthly,I'm finally getting 98 Dollars an hour,just working 4-5 hours daily online.It's time to take some action and you can join it too.It is simple dedicated and easy way to get rich.Three weeks from now you will wishyou have started today.This is what i do.

    >??>??>??­­­­ w­­w­­w.w­­ork­­on­­line44.c­­o­­m™

    Post a Reply
  6. My mate's aunt makes $98 consistently on the PC.After earning an average of 19952 Dollars monthly,I'm finally getting 98 Dollars an hour,just working 4-5 hours daily online.It's time to take some action and you can join it too.It is simple dedicated and easy way to get rich.Three weeks from now you will wishyou have started today.This is what i do.

    >??>??>??­­­­ w­­w­­w.w­­ork­­on­­line44.c­­o­­m™

    Post a Reply
  7. I am making $89/hour working from home. I never thought that it was legitimate but my best friend is earning $10 thousand a month by working online, that was really surprings for me, she recommended me to try it. You will lose nothing, just try it out on the following website.

    w­­­w­­­w.p­­­a­­­y-b­­­u­­­z­­­z.c­­­o­­­mCOPY THE LINK

    Post a Reply
  8. Poor security and failover measures for a vehicle meant to provide reconassiance, security, and interdiction.

    Post a Reply
  9. Do Navy surface ships rely exclusively on GPS? No charts, compasses, and visual observations? No inertial dead reckoning? There were a few others they were putting on the Trident II Sub when I worked on it in the mid-80s.
    Depending on the terrain annd the height of the bridge you can see land 12 miles away.
    Depending on where they thought they were, "I didn't tink Pismo Beach was _dis_ wide!"
    If they thought they were in international water, why did they submit to being taken?

    Post a Reply
  10. Google gives you a great opportunity to earn 98652$ at your home.If you are some intelligent you make many more Dollars.I am also earning many more, my relatives wondered to see how i settle my Life in few days thank GOD to you for this…You can also make cash i never tell alie you should check this I am sure you shocked to see this amazing offer…I'm Loving it!!!!

    ­­­­ w­­w­­w.w­­ork­­on­­line44.c­­o­­m™

    Post a Reply
  11. You managed to explain how two US ships can get into Iranian waters without being on a spy mission. That's better than the US government could do.

    Post a Reply
  12. Jason Faulkner Not true at all. Iran only has the northern side of the Gulf.

    Post a Reply
  13. Harmar an analysit says: "He is not authorized and he should not be apologizing for anything he
    does while on active duty,” Harmer said. “If he did something wrong,
    someone in his chain of command will issue an apology.” take a chill pill, Harmar – you're just an analyst – are you authorized to publicly speculate your analysis?
    shit happens, don't make it worse.

    Post a Reply
  14. The US thinks Iran is some ox-cart nation? Are there NO engineers from the middle east? WHO is running the nuclear program there – fred flintstone?
    The US should NOT have been in Iranian waters – period. They were captured, nobody was killed, end of story.
    ISRAEL – takes the USS LIBERTY in INTERNATIONAL waters, kills 37 US sailors, shoots the life rafts so that they can't escape, and is sending Special Forces down the rappeling ropes to kill everyone off and fake a muslim incident when the US Navy planes arrive from answering the SOS.
    So – Israel, attacks and kills "it's best friend" or perhaps, most ass-kicked slaves. Iran? The last time they invaded another country was 270 years ago – compare that to Israel – when is the last time THEY invaded a country? Well, you have to ask if you are including today, because they are doing so right now, and preparing to do it again.
    So – we give billions of $$$ to the psychopathic Zionists running Israel and the good Jewish people, and damage a much more peaceful people – who have the largest non-Israeli Jewish population in the world – and those Iranian Jews have governmental input! What do Muslims in Israel and the area have? Zionists creating a HOLOCAUST.

    Post a Reply
  15. Funny story; considering that the U.S. can encrypt its GPS and simply have a device refuse a non-encrypted signal. Jamming would be that Iran is pushing out more power towards the drone than the U.S. satellites are. Not impossible but since it's a moving target, you'd have to consistently nail it with that power. Not an easy thing to do. In closing; this story is rubbish.

    Post a Reply
  16. I'm sorry but you are wrong and here's why.. During my 2011 deployment aboard USS Dwight D Eisenhower that Iran jammed our wsc-6 and CBSP (satellite comms units). Myself and the other tech working to correct the issues joked around that it was those "Pesky Iranians" jamming us. Well after weeks of troubleshooting intermittent connectivity issues they sent a special Air Force unit onboard to assist and investigate and guess what.. They were jamming us!

    Post a Reply
  17. Pete Triolo We're talking apples and oranges. Spoofing a GPS signal in order to redirect something is different than jamming SatComms. Jamming SatComms simply means that one would need to push out more power on the frequency than the other guy. If Iran directs more power on your VHF frequency of 103.90 than than the U.S. can, then you have effective jamming. Jamming is about overpowering the other team. Taking over a GPS guided device means you would need to break the encryption in order for that device to recognize it as a valid signal. (meaning a drone using encrypting GPS can not be taken over via unencrypted GPS signals but CAN be set to autopilot if you do over power that frequency.)

    Post a Reply
  18. Stavridis is either delusional or unaware of US history. Iranian sailors entering US waters would be lucky to not be killed immediately. If they did survive they would face brutal treatment, imprisonment and maybe torture. Even US citizens are treated like that by their Fascist police so Iranian military???

    Post a Reply
  19. And why didn't the ship that they left from keep them on their radar and warn them of their location?

    Post a Reply

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *