Will Trump Take Credit for Historic Stock Market Plunge?

(COMMONDREAMS) — Bucking the wisdom of his predecessors—who operated on the knowledge that stock prices go up and down, all for a variety of reasons—President Donald Trump has not been shy about taking personal credit for the recent highs of the stock market, but with Monday’s historic drop on Wall Street the president has many people wondering if he’ll take credit (or on who he’ll cast the blame).

As USA Today reports:

Traditionally, presidents have avoided patting themselves on the back for Wall Street’s highs, because they don’t wish to be anchored down by its lows.

As Axel Merk, president of Merk Investments, said, “Let Trump take credit, but he’ll also own it should the market ever tank.”

“Trump hasn’t just claimed that stocks are up because of him,” CNN added, “he has argued without offering proof that they would have crashed if Hillary Clinton were president.”

Across social media, as the Huffington Post cataloged, countless people were making that connection rather easily after Trump went conspicuously fell silent on Monday as the market tanked:

According to the latest data from the Survey of Consumer Finances, only around 14 percent of all U.S. families directly own stocks or hold investments like mutual funds, which is why many astute economists issue the reminder in moments like these that “the stock market is not the economy.”

On the other hand, the state of other stock indexes around the world on Tuesday—not to mention that investor jitters, inflation fears, and sell-offs can have real-world ramifications—makes it clear that there are impressive dynamics in the U.S. economy exerting pressure on the globalized system.

It is “too soon to tell” if the overall economy is heading for real trouble, wrote New York Times columnist Paul Krugman on Tuesday.

“But if we are,” he noted, citing Trump and the financial team he has assembled at the Fed and within his administration, “rest assured that we’ll have the worst possible people on the case.”

By Jon Queally / Creative Commons / Common Dreams / Report a typo

This article was chosen for republication based on the interest of our readers. Anti-Media republishes stories from a number of other independent news sources. The views expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not reflect Anti-Media editorial policy.

Since you’re here…

…We have a small favor to ask. Fewer and fewer people are seeing Anti-Media articles as social media sites crack down on us, and advertising revenues across the board are quickly declining. However, unlike many news organizations, we haven’t put up a paywall because we value open and accessible journalism over profit — but at this point, we’re barely even breaking even. Hopefully, you can see why we need to ask for your help. Anti-Media’s independent journalism and analysis takes substantial time, resources, and effort to produce, but we do it because we believe in our message and hope you do, too.

If everyone who reads our reporting and finds value in it helps fund it, our future can be much more secure. For as little as $1 and a minute of your time, you can support Anti-Media. Thank you. Click here to support us

    5

COMMENTS

1

You must be logged in to post a comment.