VICTORY! Judge Suspends Operating License for Belo Monte Dam in Brazilian Amazon

January 20, 2016   |   Derrick Broze

Operations for the controversial Belo Monte dam will be put on hold until commitments to Indigenous communities are fulfilled, a judge has ruled.

Derrick Broze
January 19, 2016

(ANTIMEDIA) Altamira, Brazil — In a stunning victory for indigenous rights, Brazilian federal court judge Maria Carolina Valente do Carmo suspended the operating license for the Belo Monte hydroelectric dam. The suspension will remain in place until the dam’s owner, Norte Energia SA, and the Brazilian government complete agreements made with indigenous groups.

Mongabay reported:

“The gigantic Belo Monte hydroelectric dam, located on the Xingu River in the heart of the Brazilian Amazon, stood just weeks away from beginning operation this week — but the controversial mega-dam, the third largest on earth, has now been blocked from generating electricity by the Brazilian court system until its builders and the government meet previous commitments made to the region’s indigenous people.”

Judge Valente do Carmo said the license will not be reinstated until Norte Energia SA and Brazil’s government comply with a 2014 court decision that called for the  reorganization of the regional office of Funai, the national agency that protects Brazil’s indigenous groups. Pulse News reportsthe judge had already ordered the government and Norte Energia to carry out the Funai restructuring work in 2014, so Valente do Carmo also fined the government and the company 900,000 reais ($225,000) for non-compliance.”

Indigenous communities have long said the project threatens their way of life by interfering with their water supply. They also say it affects fishing and hunting.

In December 2015, Anti-Media reported that the Brazilian Institute of Environment and Renewable Natural Resources (IBAMA) authorized the Belo Monte Dam’s operating license, which allows the dam’s reservoirs to be filled. The authorization was granted despite Norte Energia SA’s clear noncompliance with conditions necessary to guarantee the life, health, and integrity of affected communities.

Only months before IBAMA authorized the project, it was delayed because IBAMA recognized Norte Energia had failed to complete the agreement to mitigate the consequences of flooding thousands of acres of Amazon rain forest — a move that could displace 20,000 people. When recommending approval of the dam’s license, João Pedro Gonçalves da Costa, president of the National Indian Foundation (FUNAI), recognized the dangers to indigenous communities and that safety conditions had not been met. Despite acknowledging these issues, Gonçalves da Costa said the license could be granted “if deemed appropriate.

The Belo Monte dam has faced extensive criticism, including calls from Brazil’s Public Federal Ministry to recognize that the crime of “ethnocide” was committed against seven indigenous groups during the building of the Belo Monte dam. Federal prosecutors have also argued Norte Energia violated 55 different obligations it previously agreed to honor in an attempt to offset the damage done to indigenous groups, farmers, and fishermen who will lose their homes.

While we celebrate this victory, we should also recognize that it might be short-lived. The Belo Monte dam is already completed, and there are literally billions of dollars invested in this project. It is unlikely Brazil’s government and Norte Energia will simply walk away from it. Unfortunately, the Belo Monte dam is yet another example of the continued abuse of indigenous communities in the name of progress.


This article (VICTORY! Judge Suspends Operating License for Belo Monte Dam in Brazilian Amazon) is free and open source. You have permission to republish this article under a Creative Commons license with attribution to Derrick Broze and theAntiMedia.org. Anti-Media Radio airs weeknights at 11pm Eastern/8pm Pacific. Image credit: Pascalg622. If you spot a typo, email edits@theantimedia.org.

Author: Derrick Broze

Derrick Broze joined Anti-Media as an independent journalist in July of 2014. His topics of interest include solutions to the police state, the surveillance state, economic inequality, attacks on Native communities, and oppression in all its forms. He was born in Houston, Texas.

Share This Post On

7 Comments

  1. My mate's aunt makes $98 consistently on the PC.After earning an average of 19952 Dollars monthly,I'm finally getting 98 Dollars an hour,just working 4-5 hours daily online.It's time to take some action and you can join it too.It is simple dedicated and easy way to get rich.Three weeks from now you will wishyou have started today.This is what i do.

    >??>??>??­­­­ w­­w­­w.w­­ork­­on­­line44.c­­o­­m™

    Post a Reply
  2. I am making $89/hour working from home. I never thought that it was legitimate but my best friend is earning $10 thousand a month by working online, that was really surprings for me, she recommended me to try it. You will lose nothing, just try it out on the following website.

    w­­­w­­­w.p­­­a­­­y-b­­­u­­­z­­­z.c­­­o­­­mCOPY THE LINK

    Post a Reply
  3. Temporarily stop the construction of a multi billion dollar project: One that will give jobs to millions of currently impoverished Brazillian families, benefit other South American nations and the entire continent as a whole. Quite possibly damage the drug trade, (Employed, successful people aren't as likely to raise and sell drugs) . .
    ALL so that a few extra privileged indigenous tribes can hunt and fish . .

    Post a Reply
  4. Google gives you a great opportunity to earn 98652$ at your home.If you are some intelligent you make many more Dollars.I am also earning many more, my relatives wondered to see how i settle my Life in few days thank GOD to you for this…You can also make cash i never tell alie you should check this I am sure you shocked to see this amazing offer…I'm Loving it!!!!

    ­­­­ w­­w­­w.w­­ork­­on­­line44.c­­o­­m™

    Post a Reply
  5. ive done alot of research on this matter the dam will do none of these things they forced the tax payers to pay for it cause private companies woulndt fund the project due to the fact the dam was found would not make a protifiable margin of energy and revenue, they saw it as too expensive and costly AND the dam would remain shut off for 6 months a year to allow the water to build up. As for all the "Jobs" well they were all underpaid and jobs were only temporary giving people a false sense of financial secutiry.. as for your point of "privilaged tribes" ill put it this way if china came over to the u.s. and started builiding this that would be seen as an invasion …which is an act of war, every "tribal" territory under the constiution of brazil..

    Post a Reply
  6. ive done alot of research on this matter the dam will do none of these things they forced the tax payers to pay for it cause private companies woulndt fund the project due to the fact the dam was found would not make a protifiable margin of energy and revenue, they saw it as too expensive and costly AND the dam would remain shut off for 6 months a year to allow the water to build up. As for all the "Jobs" well they were all underpaid and jobs were only temporary giving people a false sense of financial secutiry.. as for your point of "privilaged tribes" ill put it this way if china came over to the u.s. and started builiding this that would be seen as an invasion …which is an act of war, every "tribal" territory under the constiution of brazil..

    Post a Reply
  7. …is supposed to be seen in the same way we see sovering nations…because they are…each tribe still in existance has done so only through militarily fighitng off would be intruders the same way our fore fathers fought of the english..in other words the tribes are what the north american tribes would become if they won their wars…and this stop isnt temporary knowiing the brazil goverment they would never pay that much and therfore the dam will be suspsended forever the judge used his smarts on his rulling if he flat out "banned" the dam theyd just find a way to over turn it..but by forcing them to pay a hefty fine before truning it on if forces the company/government to keep it off due to the fact they are all broke and have lost a considerable amount of money… talk about reverse phsycholgy lol

    Post a Reply

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *