Houthis say the missile hit a ‘precise’ military target, but Saudi Al Arabiya says the attack was intercepted.
(MEE) — Yemen’s Houthi rebels said they fired a ballistic missile that hit a “military target” in Saudi Arabia on Thursday.
But Saudi-owned Al Arabiya TV said the missile was intercepted over the city of Khamis Mushayt, southwest of the kingdom.
Earlier, the pro-Houthi Al Masirah TV had said that the missile launch was “successful” and “precise” without specifying the location of the target.
Al Arabiya and Al Masirah also reported contradictory accounts about a Houthi offensive against a Saudi army post north of the Yemeni border in Jazan on Thursday.
Whereas Al Arabiya said Saudi forces repelled the the attack and killed tens of Houthis and troops loyal to former President Ali Abdullah Saleh, Al Masirah described the offensive as successful, reporting that several Saudi soldiers were killed.
Meanwhile, the rebels’ leader Abdulmalik al-Houthi warned of taking “sensitive steps” that would escalate the conflict if Saudi Arabia does not lift its blockade on Yemen’s ports, which is derailing aid and exasperating the catastrophic humanitarian crisis in the impoverished country.
During a meeting with Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, UK Prime Minister Theresa May urged Riyadh to end the siege on Yemen.
“The prime minister made clear that the flow of commercial supplies… must be resumed if we are to avert a humanitarian catastrophe,” a statement by her office said on Wednesday.
Early in November, the Houthis fired a ballistic missile towards Riyadh. Saudi Arabia has accused Iran and Lebanon’s Hezbollah for being behind the attack, a charge that both parties deny.
The war in Yemen started in March 2015, when Saudi Arabia launched a bombardment campaign to reinstall the government of President Abd Rabbuh Mansour Hadi, which had been pushed out by the Iran-allied rebels.
The war and Saudi-imposed siege have killed more than 10,000, pushed the country to the verge of famine and sparked a deadly cholera outbreak.
This article was chosen for republication based on the interest of our readers. Anti-Media republishes stories from a number of other independent news sources. The views expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not reflect Anti-Media editorial policy.
Since you’re here…
…We have a small favor to ask. Fewer and fewer people are seeing Anti-Media articles as social media sites crack down on us, and advertising revenues across the board are quickly declining. However, unlike many news organizations, we haven’t put up a paywall because we value open and accessible journalism over profit — but at this point, we’re barely even breaking even. Hopefully, you can see why we need to ask for your help. Anti-Media’s independent journalism and analysis takes substantial time, resources, and effort to produce, but we do it because we believe in our message and hope you do, too.
If everyone who reads our reporting and finds value in it helps fund it, our future can be much more secure. For as little as $1 and a minute of your time, you can support Anti-Media. Thank you. Click here to support us